curl-6 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
curl-6 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
curl-6 said:
oniyide said:
curl-6 said:
oniyide said:
curl-6 said:
oniyide said:
Leadified said:
oniyide said:
I dont think they have that kind of system to be honest with you. They are trying to do the WIi thing all over again. Dont do an actual generational leap, and just give the people something funky, like the wiimote before. Problem is no one cares about the pad right now, SO they dont have that and they were kinda banking on it.
|
The Wii U has more than enough to show off it's a step up from the PS3 and Xbox 360. If Nintendo will acutally show that off is another story.
|
Just like they had with the Wii? Some how i doubt that, but hell the system did come out, maybe in about five years we will see games looking a step up from PS360, considering how Wii turned out, im remaining skeptical.
|
The Wii did end up producing games the 6th gen systems couldn't.
|
No it didnt, any game on Wii could have been done on at least a Xbox, it would just be downgraded, and it took till just now to get that. There are PS360 games that CANT be dont on Wii right now. Unless its downgraded to the point where its not even the same game anymore. (Dead Rising, SW Force Unleashed, POP,etc.)
|
You can port anything to anything if you downgrade it enough.Fact is, there are games on Wii that no 6th gen console could run in their current state.
|
Ok whats your point they still could run on GC without that much sacrifice, you would still get the basic game but worst. No you cant just port anything to anything, by that logic, SNES could run Bioshock. Now you can make a SNES game called Bioshock, with the same themes, but it wont be the same thing. They tried that with Dead Rising, its not even the same game. You've played SW FU for Wii? How about PS360 version. I played all three, the Wii version is nto the same. Two different games.
|
My point? The Wii produced games beyond the capabilities of the 6th gen consoles.
If you were given cart blanche to cut down visuals to the most basic level, there's almost nothing on PS3/360 that the PS2 couldn't do.
|
Yes...Nintendo seems to like just barely one upping the last gen with their current gen tech. These two gens will be quite interesting and no...the Wii did not have better games than the PS2. Its just like the Wii U's library vs the PS3 and 360? Who cares?
|
Who said anything about the Wii having better games than the PS2?
|
What last gen is stuff is Nintendo upping?
|
Are you referring to the Wii or the Wii U, and to graphics or gamplay?
|
I would say both really to which console and to graphics or gameplay, Nintendo don't push those either. They leave the rudimentary feeling while changing the way you game. Just because I say rudimentary it doesnt mean that no difficulty is involved but there is. The rudimentary par comes from the fact of who Nintendo are making these games for. Nintendo never changes their inward mentality so I can most definitely say both. They dont push graphics even on a console that has great graphics potential. The most impressive and expansive worlds ever created was in Super Mario and Zelda and it still hasnt changed for Nintendo. Those games never pushed graphics, but they were so amazing no one gave a crap. Art style pushes so many love buttons in so many peoples memory because they can take you away from the technical aspects of the game and I think thats great. Nintendo puts you in a world where graphics dont matter and thats just the way I remember them today which is no different than yesteryear when they were my primary console provider. They dont need elaborate stories. Nintendos greatest asset is their creativity and art direction when it comes to their characters. Nintendos games have the building blocks to create gamers out of young children and novice gamers. Microsoft and Sony do no posess the key to this just yet. Sonys creative asset is narrative, cinematics, dialog and character development games with moderate level gameplay as the lowest learning curve. They essentially want you ride the movies because thats what the Playstation has turned into Universal Studios in a box whilst Nintendo is disney in a box. The Xbox 360 doesnt focus so much on the creative but general online and we can be thankful for them because if they werent around we would be scraping around. Microsofts innovation does not come from its games because thats actually their weak point, they got gamers to forget about games for ten seconds and realize that OS matters in games.
In conclusion every has their strengths and weaknesses and I like a little bit of everything.
