| darkknightkryta said: What does that matter? Nintendo has the money to invest in man power to give you these games in a timely fashion, why do we, the consumers have to deal with Nintendo because they're too cheap to do otherwise? |
I see you didnt answer the question. It matters because of choice. You could have a brand new 3D Zelda on 3DS, but it would make your wait for a brand new Zelda on WIi U longer. A top-down game isnt going to take as long to develop as a 3D game built from the ground up.
Think about it that way if 2D is annoying you. Yeah. The 3DS Zelda is gonna be a top-down Zelda. The "positive" from this, if you didnt want a top-down Zelda, is that it should make WIi U Zelda closer than it would be, if EAD3 was working on a 3D Zelda for 3DS.
You seem to be annoyed because you wanted a 3D Zelda. Youre still gonna get your 3D Zelda - On Wii U. In the form of Wind Waker first, followed by a brand new game. This game is keeping with the traditions of handheld Zelda games being from a top-down perspective.
3D for home consoles, 2D for handhelds. Seems fair to me. Ocarina 3D was the blip, the showcase, like Super Mario 64 was for NDS.
