AbbathTheGrim said:
This doesn't make sense. Do you mean which: a) Vita has not experienced boost similar to the WiiU with the release of Soul & Kagura b) Vita has experienced boost but it could sell more If the answer is A: Go to the charts and see the difference between the week for Vita before those two games and the weeks of release. Those games sold more than Lego. Vita experienced a significant increment in sales comparable to the WiiU. If the answer is B: You can't deny that Vita has released right games for the handheld as it released games that sold better than your Lego example and that pused the hardware and you have to either accept you were wrong about your initial comment regarding the Vita, or that you are wrong about your comment for the WiiU getting "right games". Vita has gotten "right games" that have pushed the hardware, the same situation that has turned out for the WiiU this week this week. There are always games that could sale better. The fact here is that the Vita get games that push the hardware like the WiiU. It could perform way better but doesn't change the fact that it is selling. If you think that Vita's current sales due to software are an indicator that it doesn't get games fit for a handheld in spite of the boost in sales then it seems that the WiiU hasn't sold much up until this point despite getting some games because the games it has got are the wrong kind for consoles. That must be your opinion because both console's performance is not much different in sales. |
I don't think the Wii U has gotten the right games either, as I stated before in the thread. I just think the bump from Lego City proves that it is software that drives sales. Does that make my comment more coherent for you?
I LOVE ICELAND!








