By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
S.T.A.G.E. on 22 February 2013
Edit Thread
archbrix said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
NintendoPie said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
NintendoPie said:
It looks quite good. Slightly worse than whatever the PS4 has, of course.


Slightly? LOL Nowhere close.

Compared to what Sony showed at their event, KillZone only looks somewhat better than this. (More effects like better reflection and particles. Other than that, not much is different, in my opinion.)

Please watch this video. It makes even Crysis 3 look just ok. It looks like you're walking through a cinematic.

 

I've seen people make this statement in the last couple of days - some going as far as saying Killzone SF "blows away" Crysis 3 PC on ultra settings.  I think people need to come back to reality here.

Killzone looks good.  Great, in fact - particularly the beginning where the entire city is visible.  The geometry, draw distance, reflections -  all look spectaular.  It's one of the best looking things I've seen.  Even the part before the explosion is just gorgeous.  It has a really nice style to it.  However, compare Killzone (I embedded the video above) where the firefight actually begins to the gameplay portions of the Crysis 3 vids below.  That's where Killzone and its 30fps begins to show its "limitations".  Don't get me wrong - it already looks great and should look even better when it comes out.  And for a launch game, it's spectacular.  But Crysis 3 on a high-end PC - even though I may not like the style as much - trumps it in the end when it comes to performance IMO.  The fast, silky-smooth frame rate adds so much to the overall visual fidelity.


I never said anything about PC ultra settings. The only thing I ever said about PC was that my laptop is I5 and plays Crysis 2 better. I am talking about consoles here. Technically PC's have been "next gen" for a little while now. I am of course speaking figuratively, because we all know PC's dont have gens.