KungKras said:
Really? You go from flame baiting by trying to insult the companies in my sig to dragging my age and nationality into this? While you yourself is only two years older than me.... And when I counter your unfounded accusations about me being ignorant, suddenly I'm bragging?. What is this? elementary school? A shitty job is a shitty job and a fun and stimulating job is a fun and stimulating job. I'm convinced that devs would have it better in the long run if companies like EA went bust. Good games are good games, regardless of how new or old they are. If you think that something like Dragon Age will age better than Ultima VII (which still isn't surpassed in scope and interactivity), or that that poor excuse for a new C&C game will be more fun to play or more timeless than say Warcraft 3, then I just feel sorry for you. Real evolution has come to gaming from companies like The Creative Assembly and Arenanet, but it sure as hell hasn't come from EA. |
You are the one who is mocking people for just liking EA games. No matter what you may think, publishers, especially big ones, make their games based on what they think the customers want. And considering EA is the number one publisher this year, clearly they made the games the customers want. Who are you to say your tastes are better than anyone elses. These games are what is popular right now. Just like Warcraft III, and sonic the hedgehog were what was popular in the past. If you don't like the direction big games are headed, lucky for you indie gaming has become bigger than ever.
Yes some franchises have been ruined, but name a big dev that hasn't done that. You sure as heck can't name Sega, Blizzard, or Nintendo. And you clearly don't seem to mind playing old games, so whats the problem with enjoying all the classics that EA has published. They have plenty.