Barozi on 20 October 2012
Since many things here are purely hypothetical.
What if you know you're getting a retarded child, you don't abort it because you think it's morally wrong, you know that this child needs double the attention of a normal child and you could not bring up enough time for a second child.
Would you admit that you rather saved one "retarded" life, than giving life to two healthy children, just because the retarded life was first ?
Because that sound morally wrong as well.
