| d21lewis said: Yeah, you can tell I picked some of the worst looking games on purpose. And I would have put games like, maybe, Oni on the PS2 (not quite a launch game, but close) or something from the Gamecube/PS3 launches but those were consoles that released long after the gen was already underway. For what it's worth, I tried to not go with the absolute worst. The thing is, I go to certain sites and see people comment like "Assassins Creed looks just like the PS3 version. Why should I buy a Wii U?" when next gen consoles don't offer those huge jumps, these days. That's one of the reasons why I skipped the Xbox 360's launch. It just didn't look like much of a jump. A little over a year later (2007), I was buying a 360 and Gears of War with a smile on my face. There are some great Wii U games at launch and I suspect that they'll look even better running at better frame rates and possibly higher resolutions than the competition. It's people criticising that it will have the same games as current gen or people knocking it because "My 360 can run that game!" that evoke a reaction from me. |
yeah true, i also changed my post a little bit, i also said i think we will get wii u games better as every ps3/360 games talking about graphical aspects. i just wanted to say that i think there was a bigger difference between xbox and xbox 360 as it seems now between ps3/360 and wii u at least when we look only at the launch of both gens. resolution alone did show me the difference at 360 release even when the games itself didn't look much different to xbox games because higher res is eating a lot of power 
