lilbroex said:
happydolphin said:
| lilbroex said:
All report say that there is absolutely no problem with wielding the Upad and that is quite confortable untop of being faster in repsonse than the actual television. Where did you get these problem froms?
|
I wasn't talking about ergonomy. I was talking about the touch controls and moving your hand from the pad to the screen. It inherently introduces a measure of latency I don't need people to tell me things like that. I can understand how that could be ambiguous though so my bad, I should have been more clear.
As for "faster in response than the actual television" I honestly don't know what HW feature you're referring to and what in my post this argues. I don't think we're talking about the same thing.
As for my use of the word cumbersome, I meant that it's not comfortable to hold your arms up to see what's on the uPad and look at the screen at the same time. It requires effort as compared to just button controllers, in exchange for a more immersive experience.
|
Those are the same argument people made about the Wii-mote. Look at how that turned out.
|
I still don't like the Wii-Mote. All I want, all I ever want, is standard gamepad controls. Zelda SS would have been better if it had OoT controls. When ever a Wii game gives me the option of using classic controls I always switch to the classic pad.
I'm fine with the WiiPad having a touch screen. There are cool things that can be done with it. But I don't want to hold up the WiiPad in front of my TV to look around. It's stupid. I could just look around with a thumb stick. I don't want to play a Zombie game where the gimmick is that while you are fussing with a touch pad you get suprise attacked by zombies.
