pezus said:
lilbroex said:
1. Nothing is on par with CGI and it never will be. It is physically impossible. UE4 is a PC graphics engine, not a console engine. The specs needed to run it properly cost thousands of dollars whosale to manufacture.
2. Generations are not decided by graphics, they are decided by overall technical advancement.
3. The look you prefer has no impact on what quality is being used. Graphics are nurmerical and measurable. There is little room for opinion when it comes to someone who understands what they are looking for.
4. Square Luminous engine didn't show much that couldn't be done in the current gen. The geometry was mostly simplistic and the effects have all been done before in current gen games. All it really had to show for itself was that it was a slight bit more diverse than the Crystal Engine.
|
You surely must be joking
|
Not at all. Some people may find that impressive, but I would say they are easily impressed.
The guys beard and the girls hair are the only really detailed things I see that could not be done on current gen hardware. That is also the only thing you saw apparently, since you went straight to only those screen shots to defend it. That is why I said "didn't show much more than what can be done this gen", because hair detail and hair physics are little more. Also, I don't recall seeing any advanced hair phsyics now that I think about it, just more detailed hair.
Other than that, it looks like the Crystal Engine.
