Izo said:
I would argue that there is abigger market for dedicated handheld gaming now. 3DS is already showing that the phone killing there buisness is laughable. Phones just dont do gaming as well as deciated devices nor do they have those high end developed games. Watching the 3DS do this great has proven to me some things. 1. Phones didn't kill handheld gaming devices. 2. Cheap free to 2 dollar apps did not kill software from dedicated devices. 3. As much as people want it to be so. Phone's haven't done jack to dedicated handheld devices. 4. No matter how well the 3DS does people will still say phones did something to its market. 5. Even if the Vita does well people will STILL say phones killed its market. My question is why? No matter what the evidence suggest I hear these phone comparisions all over the place. At what point do we just admit that it's just not true. |
It's not so much that Phones are killing the market. It's that what people want from a handheld device is not a 60 hour RPG. Kids are going to want dedicated handhelds becuase they do want a portable console. But adults would rather play Angry Birds in line at the DMV and when they get home play Uncharted on their big TV. That's how I feel and I owned every Gameboy all the way up to the DS and played them all a lot untill the DS. I thought the DS was a great little system, but I just found myself not wanting to carry it around. I found myself wanted to listen to podcasts, read a book, or play for 10 minutes on my Android here and there. I just don't want to play big games on tiny screens with uncomfortable or gimped controls. No matter how good Golden Abyss may be, I'd rather it be on PS3. The only thing my Android doesn't do that the Vita does is play games like Uncharted and I just don't want to play console games on the go anymore. Maybe if my job had me travel and stay away from home a lot, but it doesn't and I just don't feel like I need to shove another device in my pocket when I walk out the door anymore.








