fauzman said:
1. I dont see why anyone is objecting to this - Erdogan states that the warships are there to protect humanitarian aid ships not ships carrying weapons so if they want to protect it I say go ahead. From what i understand the gaza blockade is so unreasonable that they dont even allow cement in for reconstruction purposes which is insane. 2. Considering what happened on the Mavi Mamara, i think the Turks have a right to demand an apology. Remember the Israelis invaded the boat, and in international waters. Yes they were beaten upon by the activists on board but we dont know what really happened. The people on the boat claim that prior to the commandos boarding, they fired shots from the helicopters, and that the people that were killed were shot in cold blood not self defense. We dont know what happened but its very convenient that the only footage released by the Israelis shows only the attack on the commandos as they landed on the boats, NOT what happened prior to the boarding, OR what happened after the activists' attack. 3. Those who say Turkey wants a war with Israel are idiots. There is a huge difference with removing support and stopping ties with a country, to going to war with that country. Any war with Israel would cost lives not to mention taking attention away from the kurds. political instability would increase (and possibility of a coup) as opposition would claim its a move to a more islamic stance, wars are expensive and fighting such a major war would affect Turkey's economy which is currently one of the healthiest in Europe. I support the move (and the Palestinian cause). I dont see how Israel can object to humanitarian aid UNLESS they are collectively punishing the gazans for Hamas. Its not had any effect except bad publicity for israel and suffering for the palestinians and now with the egypt crossing open, its no longer going to be effective. |
as with all humanitarian aid working with a blockade, they must submit to identification and inspections as well as to move if they are told to move. and if they are directed to dock in haifa to have their "aid" (cement is restricted but permitted btw) checked over and sent over land then that is what they are required to do. any vessel refusing to do so can be legally captured. if the vessel cannot be captured or diverted the ship itself can be attacked.
the mavi marmara was not an aid vessel, it was a passenger vessel carrying hundreds of people. it had no humanitarian purpose, its purpose was solely to breach of the blockade as the organizers stated(there was NO aid on the ship!). it was the only vessel where they were any problems. why in the world would the israels peacefully land and take control of the other vessels but start shooting down into this one and then land with paintball guns as their main weapon? if there was shooting at the boat, why would so many be gathered at the landing area ready to assault the troops? why are all the injured and dead shot with the handguns? use some common fucking sense bud.
israel has no problem with aid and plenty of aid is shipped daily across the border. there is no reason for these boats to attempt to breach the blockade.
"I like my steaks how i like my women. Bloody and all over my face"
"Its like sex, but with a winner!"

MrBubbles Review Threads: Bill Gates, Jak II, Kingdom Hearts II, The Strangers, Sly 2, Crackdown, Zohan, Quarantine, Klungo Sssavesss Teh World, MS@E3'08, WATCHMEN(movie), Shadow of the Colossus, The Saboteur







