MaxwellGT2000 said:
PullusPardus said:
MaxwellGT2000 said:
Oh wow did not expect any of this, Pullus and Ssliasil, I think it might be best if you two just stopped it, I mean seriously, it's not on topic, many things stated are factually wrong, and there's no reason to continue to go off topic to the point people pull out their facts and get offended to the point fighting starts and this thread ends in flames.
|
its not really offtopic? , i'm just saying that he shouldn't say that if he himself didn't make anything new since Nintendogs, and the games after that are sequels, he then go on and talk about how polishing a game like Zelda to be immersive is something "different" , its a sequel , and building on the sequel to make it better than the last game isn't really innovative, by his logic i'd call every single sequel released this year innovative, why? because it was more polished than the last one.
i don't see how i went offtopic.
|
Uh lets see Nintendogs is 2005 and he made Wii Sports that came out in 2006, along with that he helped design the Wii and such... hrm... completely original, came out after Nintendogs, you're factually wrong and it doesn't need to go further than that, nothing more needs to be said, and it's a suggestion cause historically Thread is made -> someone posts an opinion that has a shaky basis -> someone points out facts -> many replies ensues to the point... -> people get angry -> reports start coming in -> mods have to moderate the thread.
And it's really off topic cause he's suggesting competitors would be more successful if they did something different, it in no way relates to his games, he's actually trying to say a disruptor is more successful than a follower, how is calling into question his games even related to that topic? Hell it's even about hardware not software.
|
