Smash Bros 3DS in the works?

[KungKras]

Mr Khan said:

KungKras said:

Mr Khan said:

 

I said, usually it's not a good thing and i'm usually pro-options, but i'd prefer the competitors to be spited before i get options

It was always like that whenever i wanted to play with friends. It absolutely had to be no items, final destination preferred, no weird (i.e. fun) stages allowed.

My resentment could have to do with the fact that i always lost in such matchups, especially if they were 1-on-1, but that does not mean i'm bad at the game because that is not smash bros

So you're taking an anti-competitive stance out of personal reasons?

You're entitled to your opinion, but a game with intuitive mechanics like Smash Bros deserve to be balanced. It wouldn't hurt sales to make it balanced, but doing the opposite has dissapointed people.

I don't get the bolded part.

Eh, i'm just ranting at this point. Point is i've dogmatized a vision of Smash Bros that's fundamentally opposed to the competitive one: a world where having to deactivate certain items and stages is a sign of weakness

I agree that balancing is important, i don't know how the discussion drifted away from that. The original statement was that Sakurai worked to balance the game in spite of the competitive scene, which i believe he largely did (Pit and Meta Knight aside, though the two of them lack in terms of really good launching moves even if they're broken in terms of being able to rack up damage), but balanced it in a way that the competitors disliked

Smash attacks are certainly biased in favor of certain characters as well (Olimar), but that's a debate for another day

That what I didn't like about Brawl. It was balanced in spite of competitiveness.