RolStoppable said:
Yes, there also needs to be unified hardware. I edited that into the post you just quoted, but I had that part already in my first post on this subject, so it's not like I am grasping for straws. Asking the people who made it isn't the only or even the best way to find out what the device was primarily made for, because there can be a huge difference between what people say and what they actually do. You just have to look at what purpose the most money is invested in by the manufacturer. For console makers it's naturally the development of video games, so there's no question about what these machines were intended for. |
Wait, if a company invested the most on marketing of said system, what would it make it then? Say if Apple developed a console, and took a completely hands off approach to its platform, and only marketed it as being shiny, had 3rd party software, and unified specs, would it then be a console.
"Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth." -My good friend Mark Aurelius







