| teknohick said: this isn't good news for anyone in the community. its to some companies interests that users don't know exact/specific sales data. its just more information blinded to the public. |
Yes, NPD going private isn't good for anyone, and no it doesn't make VGChartz legit. I really don't know why GAF thinks this is so big for VGC. As soon as I saw the news I was dissapointed for loss of figures, not happy for VGC.
However, to suggest that NPD isn't providing estimates also is wrong. To say that we need to check VGC against NPD is no more valid than to say that we need to check NPD against VGC. Either way, VGC does check their numbers against financial reports and any other source of valid numbers (for example, estimates by the likes of NPD or press releases by publishers).
No, fanboys can't make up crap, because we know that VGC is accurate enough for our discussions. This argument has been posed over at NeoGAF but they don't accept VGC numbers at all, VGC members should accept VGC numbers. If you are on this website and don't accept that VGC is accurate enough that you are going to disregard the numbers, then why did you start posting here in the first place? To claim that software will take this huge hit just because the US top 10 are slightly missing (we will still get rank and some numbers in reports) is sorta silly.








