BHR-3 said:
Smeags said:
I've noticed that when someone uses percentages rather than hard numbers, that said person is trying, for better or for worse, to twist the subject to better match his/her view on that same subject.
I mean, just ignore Halo: Reach's incredible 1st week sales numbers for a second and look at those much smaller percentages. For shame Halo: Reach! For shame! 
|
pretty funny considering the hard numbers are there as well, but when you cant debate properly i guess thats to be expected, i put the % b/c last time i did a thread where i was comparing numbers (NPDvs VGC) posters asked me to add the %
not saying reachs numbers a shame, even i and many others included on this site had higher hopes 5-6M range hopes and those hopes shouldnt be considered as wishful thinking considering the massive user base increase from 3, unless something else is going on...
@ kirby wheres the math fail?
|
the thing that happened was call of duty. It took a lot of the casuals. A lot of people also had predictions on the far lower scale, but your right a lot of people expected a lot higher like myself. O well I'm glad I'm enjoying the game, and the sales still put almost everything else to shame.
