Mazty said:
Kenryoku_Maxis said:
Mazty said:
The wii isn't hardcore - Nintendo even say so....So take that up with them, not me. And I never said the wii wasn't good, far from it (that's you being paranoid), I said it's not for hardcore gamers, which it isn't.
Fighting on a 2D axis is far, far easier than on a 3D one. Simple as that. My point is the wii isn't for the hardcore. What the **** is your point?
|
That just because you state something as a fact, doesn't make it a fact. Yet you keep trying to drive the point home and get defensive (see: condescending and combative) whenever someone doesn't agree with you or submit. You even did it in this post.
I'm willing to agree to disagree, but not when someone is insulting my intelligence or trying to claim something as a fact when its not. And its not a fact that 'Fighting on a 2D axis is easier than a 3D one'. Take for example Okami vs Muramasa. Or Gears of War vs Metal Slug. Or Wind Waker vs Rocket Knight Adventure. Guess which ones you will die more on?
|
Let's see. In 3D you have 3 dimensions to consider when fighting, giving you and the enenmy more angles of attacks.
On a 2D plane you have far, far less angles to worry about as you are just fighting along an X and Z axis. It's simple math.
How about you compare games that are actually similar? Compare Muramasa to Bayonetta and DMC. How about the original Prince of Persia to the Sands of Time? And if you want to talk about dying, just have a play of Mirrors Edge.
And for the finale, compare Tekken 3 to Soul Caliber.
For the hardcore, 2D is not enough of a challenge as it once was.
|
Super Mario World is a much more challenging (And fun IMO) game than Super Mario Galaxy. I guess your entire argument about 3D and tech meaning more challenge just collapsed.
