Look at me! I am playing badly reviewed games and having fun!

[leo-j]

mhsillen said:

leo-j said:

Shanobi said:

Torillian said:

adsl said:
I enjoyed Final Fantasy Crystal Bearers too and it deserves a better reviews. Since it is a Wii game the reviewers just don't like it.

Wii has already a very strong and diverse library, unique titles like FFCB, RS2, NMH2 and Just Dance keep coming, but you know that they will have bad reviews only because they aren't hd titles...

And all those pages and pages that reviewers wrote about the game as to why they thought it deserved the score they gave?  Was that all just a front so they could mask their bias?  What a bunch of BS.

Often what they write is a bunch of b.s.. It's not unheard of for game reviewers to "review" games that they haven't even played. In fact, from the retractions this generation, and the sheer epic size of many titles these days, it's becoming more of a trend.

And I wish more gamers could have been around for the old guard of video game coverage. Back before the internet you would have magazines like EGM, and you never got the feeling from any of them that they had a horse in the race. But things aren't the same now, and companies have tons of money riding on the line with their HD costs, so these days it's all about the $$$.

based on what? Maybe you should play a game like Uncharted before saying it's all bull $hit and conspiracy against the wii. Maybe the game's on the wii truely do not offer an experience as great as some available on the PS3 or XBOX 360.

 Reviewers are payed to give a professional review on a game. Compared to game's that received ratings in the 90s(super mario galaxy, legend of zelda), would you agree that the game's listed on the OP deserve scores that high too?

No reviewers are set up in nice  hotels with free drinks and free games on the publishers dime. Professional these people are not

And who mentioned uncharted? 

It was an example