By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Carl on 22 March 2010
Edit Thread
jarrod said:
Carl2291 said:
jarrod said:

No, they said some of the figures were inaccurate or approximations, before launching into the usual sort of dismissive tirade that Riley's known for.  I'm surprised certain segments around here would lend David Riley so much credence, given what he's also said about VGC being wildly inaccurate as well.

The Valkyria figures were also leaked beforehand though.  

NPD clearly state that the figures leaked were wrong...

No, they said some were wrong or approximated.  And they never specified Valkyria, who's lower NPD totals were also leaked months beforehand.

Of course if you're taking NPD's view on what's "accurate", you'd have to entirely discount the VGC figures as well.  Again, I'm asking you to consider the source here, read up on David Riley and exactly what he's said before...

Since we don;t know which ones are the "some", then it's not possible for anyone to base an arguement off of the sales that were leaked. And the apporimation was also "way off base". Which means i am still right and the numbers can't be used in any arguement...

As for the VC numbers, i'm sure we will see the truth when VC2 hits any particular milestone.

And i'm not gonna argue against some guy when he's talking about his own companies numbers. Just like i wouldn't argue against ioi about VGC numbers.