Kantor on 19 February 2010
Strategyking92 said: I think it's a question of which reviewer is reviewing each game. That doesn't mean they need to score a game 1.5 points from what it should be so that they can seem "unbiased" and "cool", and pander to a whole different group of fans who don't even own that console or that they need to score a game 1.5 or more points above what it should be, so that fans won't get mad at them if they gave it lower than what they thought. It's a fine line. I only have a problem with two reviews.. One of them getting a score waaaay over deserved, and the other getting a score that stirred up a complete shitstorm because of how they reviewed it, and how the score was .1 away from a certain special score... It just seems to me like they did that last part on purpose. |
Do tell. I can think of a few options for the first, but "special score"?