It depends on how you define revolution.
The way I think Nintendo defined it was this. And after you read this it will probably make most sense to you too, I think.
In the card game of President there's a move where you present four cards of the same value, this will create a "Revolution". This reverses the value of all cards, whereas before a A was considered a strong card now it's one of the weakest. And a 3 which was the weakest before, is now the strongest card.
The idea is that, when you're driving to overthrow an evil dictatoship. Which is what Sony was doing in terms of technology, dictating Blu ray etc, the movement turns all values upside down. Being the person in power dictating with huge funding is no longer a strong point, in "Revolution" being the alternative is much more benefitial. In this sense, Nintendo was successful and I think they never really quite aimed to do anything else.
"Revolution" is when you take objectives and reverse all values by including new perspectives. People's aims become different as they look for new uses for their hobbies.







