By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
BengaBenga on 04 November 2007
Edit Thread
ElRhodeo said:
Helios said:

Personally, I would rate Majora's Mask over OoT. Why? Because it's not just a better game, it's an evolution of the Zelda franchise. On the other hand, I wouldn't rate Twilight Princess over either of those games. Why? Because while it's a great game, it's simply a rehash of OoT. I could never rate such a game higher than the original.

Majora's Mask: I'm with you on that. Anybody who complains that all Zelda games are more or less the same hasn't played MM.

But I'd strongly disagree that Twilight Princess is a rehash of OoT. IMO, the twilight thing added a completely new feel/look/sound to the game. And the story had far more twists and interesting moments than OoT's. I loved the story driven game passages (e.g. escorting the wagon, sneaking into the castle to save midna); TP breaks the traditional division of overworld (=doesn't really matter) and dungeon (=core gameplay), which I appreciate. Last week I played the ending for the second time, and I'm absolutely amazed once again.

 


 I think the evolution from Link to the Past to Ocarina of time was more like a revolution.

While Twilight Princess was amazing, and the storyline better than any previous Zelda it was not in concept really different from OoT. That's why OoT has that 3% higher ranking. But TP still has 95% which is amazing and on current gen only beaten by BioShock. (and it is basically a GameCube game).