Why does the Zelda series exclusively focus on Ganondorf as an antagonist?

[SnesTea]

Majin-Tenshinhan said:

Snesboy said:

Naum said:
The reason I didn't enjoy Twilight Princess as much as I wanted was beacuse it didn't have enough Ganon/Ganondorf and Zelda in it.

Way too much of Midna and Zant.

She was not a villain.

Neither was Zelda. Try reading his post properly.

Pretty much, you wanted a straight fucking remake of the Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time. We have one of those, it's called Wind Waker. Except it's in an ocean.

I was going for the spoiler-free approach but fuck it:

 

When Zelda died have way through the game reviving Midna, of course Midna was going to be a major character.

 

The whole point of Zant was to hide the fact that Ganondorf was the real bad guy. Just like in ALttP, Ganon was the master controlling the puppet that was Aganihm. Except in TP, he was controlling Zant.

So when you kill off a major character for most of the game, of course there isn't going to be a whole lot seen from them throughout the rest of the game. So you would have to replace them. Case in point: Midna. Midna replaced Zelda for a good portion of the game and Zant replaced Ganon, at least until after you kill Zant.

If either of you recall, you would know that Zelda was barely in OoT. Get over it.