By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Killergran said:
tehsage said:
exindguy said:

Oh we all understood you, we just think what you're saying is utterly ridiculous.

Because a game such as Metroid can HARDLY be epic. Same with mario kart. :]

You are just being mean, and trying to make me look like a Wii-hater. Anyone who would call the HD consoles a Fun experience would need their head examined, just the same as anyone claiming the Wii to be the embodiment of Serious and Epic. And I don't mean individual titles, but the more general values the consoles hold peoples minds. But you already know this. And if you didn't, a quick look at the top 10 for each console could confirm it.

I love beautiful games. Which is not the same as games with 'good graphics'. But when I am presented with artwork as beautiful as this, there are only two ways I can be satisfied with the finished product. Either a hightech 3d world, or a 2d world.

Let me explain why you can't say a system is more epic than the other.

It is because of the software. We had epic software on the PS1 and the Super Nintendo, so hardware strength is not the issue. The reason that the 360 and PS3 is considered more "serious" is because their software strives to be more "serious". Wii currently has software that can be considered "less serious" but putting a "serious" game on Wii will not make it less seious just because it's on Wii.

The way you are thinking is called prejudice. You identify the systems as "epic" and "serious" even though they have have less "epic" software too. And you identify the Wii as less "serious" even though it got games like Metroid Prime. I'm not saying you're a Wii hater, but software is not affected by hardware. It's the other way around, the software affects the hardware. If Epic Mickey is coming to Wii, it will not make Epic mickey less epic, it will make the Wii more epic.



I LOVE ICELAND!