| valen200 said: So Snake kicking the crap out of Sonic is good, but Sam Fischer making rabbid tartar is bad?? The turles have been traveling to all sorts of odd places for 25 years now. Floating cowheads, Rabbit Ronin, squids in bodysuits, I fail to see how rabbids are that out of place. As long as they do a good job of getting characters that are Turtle-related there is no issue for me. Because of legal issues there are Turtle characters that have never interacted with each other. That and if they got permission for Usagi, it would be pretty nifty, Star wars was in Soul Calibur, Dc in Martal Kombat, Marvel vs. Capcom I really don't see it as a big deal. If the gameplay is good, then no one will care. If it sucks, then - well- no one will care. I am optimistic yet reserved. There have been disappointing Turtle games in the past, but it looks like they trying something new-ish with them. I will at least rent it with crossed fingers. |
If Sam Fisher had been in Brawl I wouldn't have complained. But this is a TMNT-game. Brawl is focused on video game characters fighting eachother. This game was meant for fans of TMNT and so far, most are disappointed with what we've seen so far. First some random Ultratron or whatever it's name was, then a generic foot soldier(which I personally think is good, but I've seen others complain about it), and now, rather than Leatherhead or Rat King, we get... Rabbids. I'm not saying this game has disappointed me yet, because let's face it - I haven't played it and we haven't seen everything there is to it yet, but from what I've seen so far? I'm more than prepared for disappointment.
As for your analogies - Both of your last two examples, (MK vs. DC and MvC) were based around the different IPs clashing! That's totally different! If this game had been named "TMNT vs Rabbids" from the beginning, or "TMNT vs Ubisoft" or whatever, naturally I would have no complaints whatsoever. As for Soul Calibur, see my earlier post about why that analogy works even worse.
