So when will Vgchartz's reviews be on metacritic?

[nordlead]

TWRoO said:

I don't see the point in an approval process as such, but just for the other reviewers to take a look and see any obvious anomaly, really no on should care if a game recieved 0.2 lower score because a certain reviewer gave it that.

I put the emphasis on "should" there because it never seems to work out... hell stupid metacritic wouldn't exists if there weren't so many people who actually care about 0.2 differences in a games score.

basically if you say it is a 9, your text has to say it is a 9. Not only that, but sometimes people point out things they left out or missed which raise/lower scores.

This is just from what I've observed, and like I said it is just to make sure numbers are in line with text.