thekitchensink on 30 April 2009
famousringo said:
thekitchensink said:
famousringo said:
I agree. It really tells you nothing about the game. There's no reason to assume that more enemies on screen will in any way make a game better, either. Would Mario Kart be more fun with more racers on the course? How about Little Mac fighting 65 boxers at once?
Some games are designed around having a legion of stupid enemies to fight, and it makes sense, like Dead Rising. But it's more important to find the number of enemies that fits your game mechanics than to just assume that more is better.
|
Don't forget that this 'new game' is going to be on their Quantum3 engine, not some Dynasty Warriors crud. It likely won't look as good as the Conduit with that many characters, but it seems like their goal with this engine is to show that the Wii can do things a lot of developers don't believe it can do.
Then again, I'm just a figment of your imagination, so what do I know...
|
No, no. You raise a good point. Besides, I find that talking to myself is the only way I can be assured of intelligent conversation.
Cookie for anybody who recognizes that reference.
|
It's Marilyn Manson. Then again, you're probably looking for responses from people OTHER than yourself.
Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?
Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off. I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."