Since a lot of salenumbers here are incomplete.....

[nordlead]

Gazz said:

nordlead said:

Gazz said:

I can't be the only one who thinks that reviews of age old games are a waste of time. This site is for sales data and not named VG old games reviews. I loved Shadow of the collosus for example, but I know about that game already and the internet is filled with info and reviews on it. Sales data however seems to be poorly documented.

I can't be the only one here who expects a sales data site to focus on it's core right? Especially when the core is still filled with huge holes..

the people who write reviews are not statisticians so it isn't a waste of resources. If you see brett or the source writing old reviews then you can complain.

you people are so whiny

So look for statiscians instead of wasting time on reviewers. The foundation needs work to provide a solid base for further developments like age old reviews.com. Do sites like gamerankings even bother to add them anyway or are these reviews in complete vain? New games do come out though, perhaps shifting focus on them instead of GT5 Proloque is worth more.

 

as rubangB said, they don't interfere with each other. The old reviews are needed to bring in new review copies. Either that or we have to buy all the games. Also, to get on metacritic you have to review some old games too. Nothing on this website is being done without a fairly good reason, and none of it draws away resources from the number crunching.

this whole old reviews topic gets brought up every single week too.