TWRoO said:
What about the tables on the front page... because I seem to have jumped to the top.... is that based on cumulative accuracy/winnings and ratio from 2009 (then converted into points) or is it based on cumulative weekly points (which means I have an advantage of doing only 2 leagues)
|
The table in the OP is purely based on cumulative for 09. Yes, people who have only been in 2 rounds have an advantage, which is why I will be bumping the minimum up to 3 rounds next week. If people don't continue to enter rounds they will be dropped off the standings. Also, as more people enter, you will be bumped farther down the Winnings column, so you only retain an advantage on Accuracy and Winnings Ratio.
I haven't figured out a better way to do overall rankings, but if you come up with something, let me know.
EDIT: I should also add, that anyone under 30 points is doing extremely well considering we have ~90 people who have entered 2 rounds this year.