| Strategyking92 said:
Well let's just think of it this way: If a forum poster brings this up now (me), think about how much worse it could be in the future when VGChartz reviews are looked upon more. Even (for a desperate lack of a better word) credible. Just saying it could come back to bite ya in the future |
That could well be. But people that moan about reviews simply because they disagree, like coolestguy, simply don't understand what a review should be about.
Reviews are a (hopefully well funded and I think VGC does that very well) opinion with a score attached to it. Some people think their opinion about a game should be shared by everyone, especially by press, but this is obviously nonsense.
Machina's Fallout review is often cited as a bad review, but it isn't. He has issues with the game and, most importantly, he wrote down what those issues were. If you don't agree that's fine,but I'm sure there are people that like the fact that a reviewer notes these flaws.
Unfortunately there will always be people that like to bitch about anyting, but I tend to think most people like our reviews, at least as a feature of the site, and as VGC continues to grow people will have to accept that they're there.
