CAL4M1TY said:
Actually, I don't think Ratchet and Clank deserved to be a 9 or higher game either, Uncharted deserves 8's or just a 9 and I haven't played wipeout yet so can't comment there. The only thing R&C has going for it is the visuals and new weapons (which, let's face it, haven't been as imaginative as previous entries), everything else about the game is R&C: Up your Arsenal. You can't honestly say it deserves AAA status if it's just the same game we've been playing for years now with new visuals. Sure they may be a little harsh with the 7.5's, but gamespot have always been known to be harsh as reviewers. |
They're not harsh, they're idiots. They gave Metal Gear Solid (Which IGN gave a 9.8, has a 94 on metacritic and is considered one of the greatest games ever made) an 8.7.
Uncharted is definitely at least a 9. Gamespot gave it an 8. The fact that they gave Braid a 9.5 (okay, I haven't played it so I can't judge) while IGN gave it an 8.8. They gave Splinter Cell: Pandora Tomorrow a 7.1 on PS2 and an 8.4 on Xbox. They consistently review 360 games before PS3 games- The Gears 2 review is already up, despite it releasing 3 days after Resistance 2 which has yet to be reviewed.
ONLY the visuals and new weapons? And the new minigames and the new story and the fact that the characters and voice acting are better than ever, and what I thought was the best improvement, the HOLO-WINGS. It's a truly excellent game, like ALL Ratchet and Clank games (Insomniac didn't make Secret Agent Clank or Size Matters so they don't count). It's an AAA for sure, but you only get the full enjoyment if you are a fan of R&C and played through Up Your Arsenal five times. That's right. Five. In fact, I think it's better than TOD, if only because of the multiplayer and the Starship Phoenix. They're both in my top 10, Up Your Arsenal at 5th, Tools of Destruction at 7th.







