Your first response was a serious post arguing with a joke.

How do you want me to interpret that?

However you'd like - that post at least could be viewed in the context of the thread rather than the context it was originally intended. The later post could not. Whether the first post was intentionally amusing or not is not so important as the fact that in some context or other, it could be a source of amusement, no?

Certainly, I am amused. Whether you yourself choose to be is no realy concern of mine. But do let me know which way you go.

Hahaha, Khuutra, nordlead already pointed it out to him.

I loved the idea of ROL being an acronym though. It should be one at some point now.

I think ROL is a good acronym of Reasoning, Obviousness and Logic.

it makes perfect sense.

Rational Observational Lulz?

seeing as how Rol pays for my services, I decided that by adding a tiny additional fee to his additional charges, I'll also enforce his trademark on "it makes perfect sense". This is your one and final warning. If you use it again extreme actions will be taken.

Rol's Trademark Enforcer
nordlead

All right, I admit I may be going a bit slow here - but in what context could.... I mean, responding to a joke with a serious post isn't amusing except in a schadenfreude sort of way, and I don't partake in that much, no.

I am amused - but by the first post, not yours.

Welcome back Rol.
Nordlead, time to set a new challenge for Rol, this one was much too easy.

Schadenfreude is the foundation of all humour, but I can see that you partake in it little. As well then, that it was not my specific intention to amuse you. In this, all things appear fair.

for those wondering where the original inspiration for my question came from, read here

http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=15707