I'm going to live in my ignorant world of bliss and joy and hold high hopes that they won't charge a monthly fee for it. If they do, well, Warhawk is still an amazing game, and Resistance 2's online looks like it will keep me busy for a long time.

It may seem weird to be so against paying for a game, but I am against paying to play a game that I already purchased. That, and I'd rather spend that extra cash on other games. =)

i hate how all these noobies who dont know crap about games are complaing, there are 256 players in only ONE match! THOSE SERVERS ARENT GONNA BE CHEAP! IMAGINE MAG AS XBOX 360 EXCLUSIVE, (not exaggerating) - $45 a month.

maybe they want people to pay for psn
first they release many games require montly fees -DC universe one of them maybe- then bring a new deal that says : save ur money and PAY 50$ yearly and play all MMORPGS instead of paying seperately for each one

Did people REALLY think there would be a an A-class MMO without subscriptions? And the consoles take an even bigger step towards being PC version 0.5.

If they want some sales, they would have to have it around $15-20.

 lol , i really didn't think of that way but probably u r right,,,

what does noobies mean???? :SSSS

i dont mind it. to have 150 players + playing at once in a shooter game is going to take some bad ass servers...(was it 155 or 256? i forget but I remember it was one of those standard server number....things)

My guess would be you'd get a one year subscription when you purchase the game. Then a monthly/yearly fee after that.

The game will most likely have boring game play like ArmA does with lots of people,its not going to be like COD4 with small maps and short ranged weapons and lots of fast paced moves cause that would be stupid with all those people.

 256