http://www.gametrailers.com/player/34591.html

I think it's fair to say that this is the best looking game seen on consoles to date.

Hmm... I saw a lot of pop-in, screen tearing and the PS3 version looked like it was running at under 30fps in some parts.

I would get the PC version if I had the money to build one.

In fact I wasn't very impressed with that gameplay. Physics are amazing but overall nothing special(explosions looked ugly). Killzone 2 looks much better.

Okay...whos gonna say it will look/run better on the 360 first?

haha this is my first post, PS3's version looked better in my opinion. I loved the original Farcry and will deffinatly buy this for PS3 when its out.

woo check out all the exclusives coming ps3's way

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_PlayStation_3_games 

Im gonna say I cant wait to play the game? The realistic graphics are incredible, regardless of the technical issues (obviously because its an early build).

Glad I have a PC instead... looks like some major stress issues on the consoles for this game. They aren't running on the same engine as the PC version though.

It's definitely not because it's an early build... There are major framerate and pop-in issues there.  That's not going to be resolved.  Everyone jumps to "early build" everytime a developer shows footage of something like it's going to be drastically different in 4 months when it's released, but it's not.  4 months from release you are seeing basically the best they have to offer.  It's just not a game the consoles are really equipped to handle. 

The game looks ok, but fall behind the PC version, by a lot, but this engine is running on the PS3 so, they are one step ahead of Crytek...

And yes the pop up is here to stay, due to the small amounts of ram...

MGS4 looks better,but i think the pc version aslo looks better