By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Runa216 said:
Immersiveunreality said:

And same for those that want others to behave in a certain way and spout this and that about all the different kinds of bad if the only thing making them good is that silly vote then they need to get to work,it is so damn lazy to solely be a keyboardwarrior and the worst thing about it is that it only drives people apart and that judging and belittling makes you rarely convince anyone. I do not know who in here is sincere or not but those that do not actively try to make a difference might just be here to smugly boost their own ego and yeah those are part of the problem.

Also people firstly blindly vote for anything and secondly Trump has many decent people that voted for him too without any hatefull intentions,your image of the world and its people is a bit unrealistic negative imo.

I actually have a very positive outlook on the world. Globally, we're doing better than we ever have been...but if you voted for Trump, you tacitly endorsed regression, bigotry, and ignorance. That's just what that actually means. It doesn't matter your intent or outside behaviour, if you voted for someone who campaigned on bigotry, you support bigotry. That's, like, a fundamental truth of the situation, and saying otherwise is doing a great disservice to the idea of accountability and democracy. 

So to some extent we all support bigotry because no matter the way you vote there will be people being victimized and that support does change in proportion if you count in the intent imo,at the end of the road those people that voted wrongly while having good intent will still have a welcoming heart to others.

The way that is spoken about Trumpvoters is a bit ridiculous,overblown regressive and stupid,the minority of trumpvoters that are haters get projected on all of them and you wont get them switching camps like that,if that is not the goal it is just worthless to anything but yourself and the sameminded.

Bolded: I'm happy to read that,i might just be focussing on you posting in political discussions but there is rarely a positive sparkle in the post you make about these kind of things so i risked to assume you had such a mindset and that might have been wrong,anyway i think differently than you about the group of people you talk a lot about in this thread but that could be partly life experience and perception.

On a side note: If you do not want to be a part of those horrible fundamental truths yourself it would be hard to keep living in our western society.



Around the Network
RJTM1991 said:
Biggerboat1 said:

Man, you're like a broken record.

1. He's never said he doesn't want his money - and just his money would make ZERO difference at a national level.

2. He wants to tax at a national level to provide improved services.

These points are not mutually exclusive so just stop.

Your arguments are so full of broken logic that it's like trying to untangle a knot of wires...

I, and others have outlined in broad strokes what Bernie wants for the US and it isn't a socialism dream. You've been corrected on this multiple times and yet persist to trot out the same hubris...

Am I correct in thinking you're from the UK? If so, I'm assuming you think we're way too left, as Bernie's America would still be right of us...

Though, that stance wouldn't make a lot of sense as you profess to give most of your money away if you had it, which seems decidedly progressive...

I really don't know what your underlying motivation is, other than to shit on everything.

It's not broken logic. It's true. Why do you think the Dems don't even want anything to do with him?

You can white knight him all you want, but it is what it is.

Because the establishment democrats are neoliberals who pretty much embraced Reaganomics. Sanders is pretty much the exact opposite of that. He wants to raise the taxes on the rich, including himself! Just compare his wealth tax plan with those from the other ones running the democratic primary: Only Warren comes even close to what he proposes, and he himself would need to pay more through it.

Or, to put it in Alpha Centauri terms:

Republicans are either Corazon Santiago or Miriam Godwinson (depending on the person), but think they are Mwabudike Morgan

Establishment Democrats are Mwabudike Morgan and think they are Pravin Lal

Sanders is Jim Jones (from the expansion) or Deidre Skye but gets portrayed as Shen-ji Yang

Last edited by Bofferbrauer2 - on 13 February 2020

Bofferbrauer2 said:
RJTM1991 said:

It's not broken logic. It's true. Why do you think the Dems don't even want anything to do with him?

You can white knight him all you want, but it is what it is.

Because the establishment democrats are neoliberals who pretty much embraced Reaganomics. Sanders is pretty much the exact opposite of that. He wants to raise the taxes on the rich, including himself! Just compare his wealth tax plan with those from the other ones running the democratic primary: Only Warren comes even close to what he proposes, and he himself would need to pay more through it.

Or, to put it in Alpha Centauri terms:

Republicans are either Corazon Santiago or Miriam Godwinson (depending on the person), but think they are Mwabudike Morgan

Establishment Democrats are Mwabudike Morgan and think they are Pravin Lal

Sanders is Jim Jones (from the expansion) or Deidre Skye but gets portrayed as Shen-ji Yang

Got to love how, despite the fact that he's a Senator and has been in the system for decades, people claim that Bernie isn't a part of the establishment. What high-level mental gymnastics do you have to do to come to that conclusion?

At the end of the day, he's still a Senator, still a multi-millionaire and still has three houses. That's a title, millions of dollars, and two houses more than his followers will ever have. He might say that he wants to raise taxes or do this and that but he doesn't and he won't.

We go back to the 'this is your house on Socialism, this is your politician's house on Socialism' meme. The guy's full of shit, man.

Here's a little piece on Bernie:

https://thinkprogress.org/how-off-brand-bernie-sanders-is-barely-a-millionaire-653da838c44c/

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/think-progress/

Another fun article, noble Bernie says that his wealth "isn't proof of the American Dream."

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/15/us/politics/bernie-sanders-fox-town-hall.html

Personally, I think everyone's favorite Seabiscuit cosplayer and fellow Socialist, AOC, is a prime example of the American Dream. Only in America can you go from being a moronic bartender to a know-nothing politician and make six figures doing so.



RJTM1991 said:
Biggerboat1 said:

Man, you're like a broken record.

1. He's never said he doesn't want his money - and just his money would make ZERO difference at a national level.

2. He wants to tax at a national level to provide improved services.

These points are not mutually exclusive so just stop.

Your arguments are so full of broken logic that it's like trying to untangle a knot of wires...

I, and others have outlined in broad strokes what Bernie wants for the US and it isn't a socialism dream. You've been corrected on this multiple times and yet persist to trot out the same hubris...

Am I correct in thinking you're from the UK? If so, I'm assuming you think we're way too left, as Bernie's America would still be right of us...

Though, that stance wouldn't make a lot of sense as you profess to give most of your money away if you had it, which seems decidedly progressive...

I really don't know what your underlying motivation is, other than to shit on everything.

It's not broken logic. It's true. Why do you think the Dems don't even want anything to do with him?

You can white knight him all you want, but it is what it is.

Wow, what a well thought out and compelling rebuttal!

As usual you cherry pick what you want to and ignore the rest...

Honestly, I dont know why people like you post on a forum. You have zero interest in what others have to say. Your opinions are fixed in stone regardless of any evidence which should make any open-minded person at least question them. You just regurgitate the same tired over-simplifications over and over. Seriously - why are you posting?



Biggerboat1 said:
RJTM1991 said:

It's not broken logic. It's true. Why do you think the Dems don't even want anything to do with him?

You can white knight him all you want, but it is what it is.

Wow, what a well thought out and compelling rebuttal!

As usual you cherry pick what you want to and ignore the rest...

Honestly, I dont know why people like you post on a forum. You have zero interest in what others have to say. Your opinions are fixed in stone regardless of any evidence which should make any open-minded person at least question them. You just regurgitate the same tired over-simplifications over and over. Seriously - why are you posting?

Eh, are you looking at a mirror or something? Because all that sounds a lot like you. I've commented on umpteen issues in this thread, and all people can do is nitpick and stick to their Lib scripts. I came into this thread to see what people thought. To try to see things through other peoples' eyes. I've been wrong, sure, but hit the nail on the head with most.

Can you point me to the things that I've cherry-picked and the things I didn't comment on, please? Because, going by my post count, I've only interacted with you on here 3 or 4 times. So I've got no idea where your "as usual" line comes in to play.

Right, so, you commented on me taking a jab at that guy's age and pigeon-holing. I replied.

You then typed an overly long WOT talking about Bernie and god knows what else, it didn't make much sense. I replied.

Then, you posted about me not responding to your point regarding pigeon-holing. But I did. Read my other comments.

And on this one, check my last comment on the previous page. There's a lovely wee piece that essentially backs up everything I've said about the hypocrite Bernie. And the best part? It's by a heavily biased Liberal website! So no discrediting that one!



Around the Network
SpokenTruth said:
Considering this debate has been had with him before, he has shown no evidence of intending to engage in constructive discourse and espouses hate and vitriol, I will no longer interact with him.

I have the luxury of muting him with the ignore feature.

This coming from the guy who's happily taken little passive aggressive schoolyard cheapshots. How lovely and considerate of you to jump back on to your high horse and ride off into the mute button sunset as soon as you don't know how to respond.

Very mature, man.



Bandorr said:
Biggerboat1 said:

Wow, what a well thought out and compelling rebuttal!

As usual you cherry pick what you want to and ignore the rest...

Honestly, I dont know why people like you post on a forum. You have zero interest in what others have to say. Your opinions are fixed in stone regardless of any evidence which should make any open-minded person at least question them. You just regurgitate the same tired over-simplifications over and over. Seriously - why are you posting?

Two word answer: Attention & Hate.

They love talking the hate. Spreading the hate. And most importantly "getting" that reaction from someone with the hate. It is just a generic version of trolling.

Say something intentionally hate filled or stupid and "laugh" at any responses.

They are devoid of positive attention in their life, so they found the concept of "negative" attention.  Attention by any means. By stupidity or hatred. 

Ah, the typical "guy has different opinion, therefore troll" post. Anything to drown out people who won't follow the herd, eh?

This thread's a giant anti-Conservative, anti-Trump circlejerk of hate. Same with the Dem thread. Pot meet kettle.

Last edited by RJTM1991 - on 13 February 2020

Immersiveunreality said:
Runa216 said:

I actually have a very positive outlook on the world. Globally, we're doing better than we ever have been...but if you voted for Trump, you tacitly endorsed regression, bigotry, and ignorance. That's just what that actually means. It doesn't matter your intent or outside behaviour, if you voted for someone who campaigned on bigotry, you support bigotry. That's, like, a fundamental truth of the situation, and saying otherwise is doing a great disservice to the idea of accountability and democracy. 

So to some extent we all support bigotry because no matter the way you vote there will be people being victimized and that support does change in proportion if you count in the intent imo,at the end of the road those people that voted wrongly while having good intent will still have a welcoming heart to others.

The way that is spoken about Trumpvoters is a bit ridiculous,overblown regressive and stupid,the minority of trumpvoters that are haters get projected on all of them and you wont get them switching camps like that,if that is not the goal it is just worthless to anything but yourself and the sameminded.

Bolded: I'm happy to read that,i might just be focussing on you posting in political discussions but there is rarely a positive sparkle in the post you make about these kind of things so i risked to assume you had such a mindset and that might have been wrong,anyway i think differently than you about the group of people you talk a lot about in this thread but that could be partly life experience and perception.

On a side note: If you do not want to be a part of those horrible fundamental truths yourself it would be hard to keep living in our western society.

There's actually a really strange point to be made, here. See, You don't see the good things I want to say because I don't feel the NEED to praise or be positive all the time when it comes to a lot of things. If there's a topic where everyone's happy, I don't need to interfere or put in my two cents becuase it'd just be another opinion in a sea of positive opinions. It'll look like an echo chamber and I don't want to perpetuate that. 

Hell, I even think that games, movies, TV, and literature are also all pretty awesome. Gaming is better today than it has been for the majority of my life, Movies are more respectful of their audiences and risky than they've been for years, TV is more risky and fun and engaging than it ever has been, and books and other forms of media are all going through boom periods. almost all of this is due to the technological infrastructure we have with streaming and online functionality that gets more accessibility to more audiences, thus ensuring there's something for everyone. Games used to JUST be one-and-done games or ones that never end. they USED to be simple affairs in different, easily segmentable genres based on gameplay styles and such. Now, we have indies and blockbuster games and online games and free to play games and mobile games and singleplayer games that can be any blend of genres and styles you could fathom. Yeah, microtransactions and loot boxes are objectively terrible...but they only account for like less than 5% of the gaming industry. Stuff like Netflix and Hulu gives creators FAR more freedom to make unique and quirky film and TV that you'd NEVER see in the past. 

My point is, in many ways, the world is better now than it has ever been. 

When it comes to world poverty rates, war, scientific progress, crime, and all that jazz, we're doing better than we ever have been. You'd never know it since media is a business and stoking the flames of drama and sharing negative news that gets people angry pays the bills and gets the hits, but the reality is that things are actually pretty good. Corporations are shit and politics are less about doing the right thing and more about fighting the opposition, but things are actually pretty good in the grand scheme of things. When it comes to human rights, progression in terms of gender, sexuality, or ethnical equality, we've come so remarkably far in the last 20 years it's kind of astounding. we're making so much progress and the world is SO much better for SO many people it's insane, and I love it. That's why I get so angry in these political threads. All I see is a rather large contingent of people boldly and aggressively shouting that Muslims are subhuman in a world where a simple google search can actually give you all the information you need regarding REAL statistics on extremism rates and comparisons to other religions. People say that Gays ruin families when any search at all will provide you with all the data to see that no, that is unequivocally not the case. 

I'm always upset in these threads becuase we collectively should know better. I see entirely too many instances of people - especially those on the political right - fearmongering and hatemongering and making claims and saying stupid shit that SOUNDS reasonable if you don't actually put any thought into it but fall apart at the most rudimentary research. And yet, despite their claims being obnoxiously easy to disprove, their voices carry becuase while people are smart they're also so, profoundly stupid and easily manipulated. Someone screaming 'Autism is caused by vaccines' or 'the earth is flat' is so patently ridiculous that any normal, reasonable, intelligent person can easily dismiss it as the nonsense it is, yet people's inherent fears perpetuate it. The same can be said for stuff like Trump's claim that 'immigrants cause all the crime'. IT's factually, provably, astoundingly wrong...but people still believe it becuase it's easier to blame illegal immigrants - thus creating an us vs them tribalistic mentality - than it is to actually delve into the research and find the underlying problems in this world to fix it. 

Climate Change, wealth inequality, bigotry in all its forms, and so many other global factors are being stunted from having any progress done to them becuase of a vocal, shockingly large contingent of people don't WANT to fix them or don't WANT to take responsibility and thus deny their importance. People like RJTM1991 and EricHiggin and a handful of others on this forum are actively making the world a worse place by pushing their stunningly wrong stances on so many matters and muddying the water by clouding the judgement of others and I find that absolutely appalling. 

Not only are they not helping, they demonize those who actually want to do something about it, and that's abhorrent behaviour. 

I am positive on the whole about humanity becuase we clearly have so much potential and can do so much, which is exactly why there's no excuse for so much of today's problems to continue to exist. Bigotry is only a problem becuase the vocal minority who believes that all muslims are terrorists or that black people are more prone to crime or that the Chinese are gonna take over the world speak louder. Climate change is a problem becuase 'skeptics' keep pushing false narratives and acting like the 'skeptic' community has ANY science supporting their side, when it just doesn't. Fearmongering and HAtemongering are far easier to perpetuate than truth, becuase truth requires you to put in hard work to learn and understand. 

Which is why I'm so persistently angry about politics. 

And to make it worse, virtually anything I've said in this post could be turned around by someone dedicated enough to make it sound like I'm some tyrant trying to silence people or take away freedoms. I'm certainly not doing that, but if I had to choose between redneck mcmexicansterkerjerbs' having the right to wear a KKK uniform and protest trans rights vs solving climate change and fixing wealth inequality...well, dumb people kinda have to get out of the way and stop resisting positive change. I'm sick of the vocal minority ruining it for everyone else. and I'm even more sick of the fact that SOMEOnE will try to turn that around and use it as an excuse to disrespect minorities that are actually oppressed or mistreated. 



My Console Library:

PS5, Switch, XSX

PS4, PS3, PS2, PS1, WiiU, Wii, GCN, N64 SNES, XBO, 360

3DS, DS, GBA, Vita, PSP, Android

Hey, here's something political that is American:

Man upset he can't bring cutout of Donald Trump to dialysis

You're welcome, VGC!



Trump is guarantee to have another 4 years. Democrats have show how immature they truly are and they have no answer to the Donald.

Last edited by Snoopy - on 15 February 2020