Is this serious post? Switch is selling great, Nintendo games are selling great on Switch and Nintendo again making huge profit (much bigger than in period of 3DS+WiiU). I don't see how anyone with little sense can call that "dark age for Nintendo".
And yes, Switch will probably top 85m+, but its not like Switch needs to sell so much that we could say that "dark ages" for Nintendo are over.
Where is your problem? I never said that this is a dark age for Nintendo (op used the term) and I never denied the profit of the Switch.
I don't know how it compares to 3DS and Wii U but I doubtthat it is "much bigger profit" than the 3DS and Wii U. Switch might top 85M, but we don't know that yet. Imo if you want to say that Switch overcame the dark ages for Nintendo it would have to be much more profitable for Nintendo than 3DS and Wii U combined.
My problem? Your post "But Nintendo sold 85M+ consoles with the 3DS and the Wii U combined. What is the reason to say that the Switch ended the "dark ages of Nintendo"? Do you think the Switch will top 85M+?". You post clearly imply that you think that even is "dark age for Nintendo" you doubt that Switch is ending dark age for Nintendo, I gave you clear facts ( Switch is selling great, Nintendo games are selling great on Switch and Nintendo again making huge profit) why Nintendo with Switch isnt in dark age in any case.
You can doubt whatever you want, I talking about clear facts. But thats a point Switch is already making much bigger profit for Nintendo than 3DS and Wii U did combined. Also, curently 80m is like minimum that Switch will hit, even 100m+ is possible at end.
Nintendo sees best profits for nine years