HOW ABOUT DEM COWBOYS!!!!
Who Will Win Super Bowl LIII? | |||
Saints | 5 | 21.74% | |
Chiefs | 2 | 8.70% | |
Rams | 3 | 13.04% | |
Patriots | 9 | 39.13% | |
Cowboys | 2 | 8.70% | |
Chargers | 1 | 4.35% | |
Eagles | 1 | 4.35% | |
Colts | 0 | 0% | |
Total: | 23 |
Sorry I missed the last several weeks man. Was dealing with some personal shit over the holidays.
MTZehvor said:
Yep. Got your picks. |
There are two NFC East teams representing the 4 NFC teams left in the playoff. And you said Cowboys division is weak lol. Also, if the Redskins had their starting QB there was a good chance they would've made it.
Good lord, Bears need a new kicker. Not that I can talk, Cowboys need one too.
Fuckin Parkey..
My buddy, a big football guy, near mid season is like "This dude Parkey's going to be the death of us". I was like, "haha yeah sure man." Little did I know.. Guess he did know what he was talking about after all.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident - all men and women created by the, go-you know.. you know the thing!" - Joe Biden
To be fair to Parkey, with 300 yds, the rest of the offense could only get 1 TD. Parkey hit 3 other FG's and probably would have hit the extra point making it a tie, but the rest of the Bears offense failed a 2 pt conversion and then Parkey fails a longer FG that happens to be at the end of the game. They should replace him for sure for the rest of the missed FGs during the season, but that game was not only on him.
Snoopy said:
There are two NFC East teams representing the 4 NFC teams left in the playoff. And you said Cowboys division is weak lol. Also, if the Redskins had their starting QB there was a good chance they would've made it. |
...unless my memory is failing me horribly, I'm pretty sure I never said anything like that. I said the Giants were terrible, and that playing your division rivals is not tougher than playing outside of it, regardless of division. You'll have to point me to where I said the NFC East was a weak division.
MTZehvor said:
...unless my memory is failing me horribly, I'm pretty sure I never said anything like that. I said the Giants were terrible, and that playing your division rivals is not tougher than playing outside of it, regardless of division. You'll have to point me to where I said the NFC East was a weak division. |
You made the point the Bears division is weak and then try to compare the scenario multiple times to the Cowboys. Not only that but you also showed many times that you are not impressed with Cowboys at all, the division winners. So if you're not impressed by the Cowboys, you must think their division is weak. Also, Giants are not weak, they almost beat the Cowboys and Eagles, 2 of the top 4 teams in the NFC. Proving my point yet again these division teams play hard.
Last edited by Snoopy - on 06 January 2019Snoopy said:
You made the point the Bears division is weak and then try to compare the scenario multiple times to the Cowboys. Not only that but you also showed many times that you are not impressed with Cowboys at all, the division winners. So if you're not impressed by the Cowboys, you must think their division is weak. Also, Giants are not weak, they almost beat the Cowboys and Eagles, 2 of the top 4 teams in the NFC. Proving my point yet again these division teams play hard. |
...all of a sudden, I now understand why reading comprehension scores are so bad across the board for the state of Texas.
MTZehvor said:
...all of a sudden, I now understand why reading comprehension scores are so bad across the board for the state of Texas. |
... all of sudden I know why you make excuses.