"Just to clarify this game is historically accurate and contains no fantasy elements. It takes place at 1403 in the kingdom of Bohemia. To be honest, the review is alright until you get to the end of where this silly crap is brought up."

You specifically referred to the part you were quoting as "this silly crap".  So I think that my inference skills are pretty much on point when I say that your point was that it was absurd.

When you're referring to the portion your quoting as "silly crap" and then leave out part because it's absurd that kind of reeks of bullshit.   And if you cut out the absurd part, are you saying that the part you left in is not absurd?  That it's a reasonable argument?

For fuck's sake, you're really reaching for anything at this point. 😹

My comments weren't targeting you specifically. Just the general political rhetoric between the left vs right.
So feel free to go have a nap or something.

I am indeed reaching for any sort of logic behind what you're saying.  It's very difficult.  Feel free to assist me by clarifying and answering questions.  I am particularly interested in the distinction between what is absurd and what is silly crap.  

Again, my claim is that review is a sjw review. That's my whole point and you're not refuting it by trying to argue over something absurd. 😱

If you're not actually gonna present a decent argument then I'm not gonna pay you any more of my attention because it's a waste of my time.

I'm not refuting your point that it's a sjw review because I really don't care.  I do care that you are presenting the information in, as far as I can see, a dishonest fashion.  I'm trying to get a coherent answer as to why you chose to cut the quote as you did.

You claimed you omitted a part of the quote because it was absurd.  You also referred to the part you did include as silly crap.  Your words.

So, I'm trying to understand why, when you were claiming that what you were posting was silly crap, you chose to omit a part for being absurd, which to me seems essentially synonymous with silly crap.  It's a pretty simple question.  Your unwillingness to answer it makes me think that isn't actually the reason you took out that part.

Since you ignored my last reply to you, this is the last one I'm going to give you.

They would not have had to force anything. The historical context is there, they would just have to set their game accordingly. They didn't. Because it wasn't a priority. Those points arent really up to debate.

Games don't just 'happen'. Like you said yourself, there's concious decision making behind all of this. They made the game they wanted to make.

You're failing to see that there's tangible proof that these people existed in Europe at the time. Hence why they could be included in a 'historically accurate' game about the period. By setting it in an area that had very little contact to outside influences, the devs made a concious decision. Maybe they just really wanted to set it there, because they like the area. That does not make them racist or anything, but it does mean that the aerial setting of their game was more important to them than having diversity. See? Decision making.

Pretending like there's anything else going on here is just dishonest and would probably also make for a bad game.  They have every right to make this decision. There's no need to hide behind a flimsy argument.

Lastly, we tell stories about extraordinary people because they are interesting. That's how most of all storytelling works, especially hero stories. A game can only benefit from having an interesting cast of characters that face unique challenges.

Even if there were a few non-Caucasians at that time period, the inclusion of them would have to be done in a similar manner as in Battlefield 1, where the portrayal of an overwhelming minority is shown.

A dev can opt to portray a minority, but it definitely shouldn't be required of them.

I don't agree with everything in the review but the politics/ideology behind a game is something we should certainly critique and think about. If the creator's earnestly aren't doing so, it just means the aren't giving their art form the respect I think it deserves.

As some guy who's actually from Bohemia commented on EG - town is not on that route, route went north of that region. That historian is really talking out of his ass and obviously knows very little about Central Europe...and EG is well known for their SJW crap, especially to boost their traffic, so let's not pretend that this is anything but that.