By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - The sjw review by eurogamer on Kingdom Come: Deliverance

I'll complain about all the games set in feudal Japan that doesn't show European people or people talking in Portuguese while being christian... because we know Portugal had influenced Japan, had some possibility of offspring and taught their language.

So I demand a quota of Portuguese people in all japan based games after the middle age.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
RolStoppable said:
bananaking21 said:
" The game's makerssay they've done years of research and found no conclusive proof there should be"

his "specialist" says:
""You just can't know nobody got sick and stayed a longer time," he says. "What if a group of black Africans came through and stayed at an inn and someone got pregnant? Even one night is enough for a pregnancy."

thats not conclusive proof you fucking dipshit. its one thing trying to make a race issue where there is none, but its another being a moron while trying to do so.

Indeed, it doesn't make sense. I was curious and looked up the review and here is the uncut version that I found:

When Kingdom Come does succeed, it's peerless. The Elder Scrolls and The Witcher can feel flimsy next to the sophisticated systems and heft of history on show here.

But there's also a big problem. There are no people of colour in the game beyond people from the Cuman tribe, a Turkic people from the Eurasian Steppe. The question is, should there be? https://www.resetera.com/threads/separating-games-from-their-creators-kingdom-come-deliverance.17250/">The game's makers say they've done years of research and found no conclusive proof there should be, but a historian I spoke to, who specialises in the area, disagrees.

"We know of African kings in Constantinople on pilgrimage to Spain; we know of black Moors in Spain; we know of extensive travel of Jews from the courts of Cordoba and Damascus; we also know of black people in large cities in Germany," the historian, Sean Miller, tells me. Czech cities Olomouc and Prague were on the famous Silk Road which facilitated the trade of goods all over the world. If you plot a line between them, it runs directly through the area recreated in Kingdom Come. "You just can't know nobody got sick and stayed a longer time," he says. "What if a group of black Africans came through and stayed at an inn and someone got pregnant? Even one night is enough for a pregnancy."

It's not conclusive proof but it's readily available doubt to undermine Warhorse's interpretation. What muddies the water further is whose interpretation it overridingly is: creative director, writer and Warhorse co-founder Daniel Vavra's. He has been a vocal supporter of GamerGate and involved in antagonistic exchanges on Twitter (collected in https://www.resetera.com/threads/separating-games-from-their-creators-kingdom-come-deliverance.17250/page-2%23post-3450110">a ResetEra thread). More recently, he wore the same T-shirt depicting an album cover by the band Burzum every day at Gamescom 2017 - a very visible time for him and his game. Burzum is the work of one man: Varg Vikernes, a convicted murderer and outspoken voice on racial purity and supremacy. He even identified as a Nazi for a while.

This isn't to say Kingdom Come: Deliverance is a hotbed of racism, because it isn't. The Turkic Cumans speak a different language and are a hostile enemy, which seems like a limited portrayal but no less so than any other war game I can think of. Then again, I'm white, so maybe I've missed things. And racism can take many forms, one of them being exclusion.

More apparent to me was the back-slapping laddishness revolving around bedding women. I'm pursuing a love story over here, while over there bedding a noble and having one-night stands. That's in addition to my Troubadour perk which makes me even more irresistible to women and lets me use the "bathwenches" for free, which ties into a key mechanic of keeping yourself clean and patched up. It also means I get the Alpha Male buff (+2 to Charisma) because I've been satisfied and apparently it shows. It literally says that. The game's Codex even feels the need to describe the ideal woman of the time: "a thin, pale woman with long blonde hair, small rounded breasts, relatively narrow hips and a narrow waist".

All of which means that a shadow lingers over Kingdom Come: Deliverance. Instead of challenging the Dark Age it reinterprets 615 years later, the game seems to delight in it. Instead of seeing notes in the margin of a history book, we get what feels like a glossy pamphlet advertising an escape into an oddly romanticised past. And it's that, ultimately, which makes me too uneasy about Warhorse's work to be able to recommend it.

So the reason why it doesn't make sense is not because the historian is a complete idiot, but because the original poster provided selective quotes to misrepresent the review. That doesn't mean that putting calls for diversity into reviews is a practice that should be encouraged, but merely that the situation isn't as deplorable as it was depicted in this thread.

"It's not conclusive proof but it's readily available doubt to undermine Warhorse's interpretation."

" The game's makerssay they've done years of research and found no conclusive proof there should be"

 

so pretty much what i said. the reviewer is angry that there is no conclusive proof that there were people of color in that area and time frame. its a stretch. just because the co director wore a t-shirt of an album of some formerly racist person doesnt mean the creative effort of hunders of people is racist by not including people of color, when again, there was no hard evidence proof that there were any in that period. at the end of the "analysts" statements he flat out says "you just dont know" and "what if". well that isnt a strong arguement at all. and just points more towards the case that the writer himself is a dipshit, like i said earlier, trying to find racism where there is none. 




HoloDust said:
JWeinCom said:

 

Yes, it is taken out of context. Because, the first part of the historian's quote explains why specifically in that area there may have been different ethnic groups.  The first half explains that because the town was located on a popular trade route, it is reasonable that there may have been people from other cultures and locales staying there.   

As some guy who's actually from Bohemia commented on EG - town is not on that route, route went north of that region. That historian is really talking out of his ass and obviously knows very little about Central Europe...and EG is well known for their SJW crap, especially to boost their traffic, so let's not pretend that this is anything but that.

I really don't know enough about the region to comment one way or another.   But, whether or not the historian was accurate, there was no reason to post the comments in full.  

DonFerrari said: 
JWeinCom said:

All you've done is suggested the reviewer was dishonest too, which, even if true, would do nothing to justify the OPs dishonest presentation of information.  

On that point I would have to agree that two wrongs wouldn't make one right. Still when you read the whole thread you'll see that the reviewer were dishonest or lacked the will to do real research in his attempt to make a point... and also it's clear how bad he portrayed his point as well.

The thing is that I don't really frequent Eurogamer, so I'm not really concerned about their reviewers.  It's just not relevant to me.  I do frequent this site, and their are quite a few topics that misrepresent information to promote an anti-SJW agenda, so that does concern me.  



JWeinCom said:
HoloDust said:

As some guy who's actually from Bohemia commented on EG - town is not on that route, route went north of that region. That historian is really talking out of his ass and obviously knows very little about Central Europe...and EG is well known for their SJW crap, especially to boost their traffic, so let's not pretend that this is anything but that.

I really don't know enough about the region to comment one way or another.   But, whether or not the historian was accurate, there was no reason to post the comments in full.  

DonFerrari said: 

On that point I would have to agree that two wrongs wouldn't make one right. Still when you read the whole thread you'll see that the reviewer were dishonest or lacked the will to do real research in his attempt to make a point... and also it's clear how bad he portrayed his point as well.

The thing is that I don't really frequent Eurogamer, so I'm not really concerned about their reviewers.  It's just not relevant to me.  I do frequent this site, and their are quite a few topics that misrepresent information to promote an anti-SJW agenda, so that does concern me.  

So the anti-SJW concerns you more than the shenanigans of the SJW and their thrive to make government involve and censor everything they don't like??

That certainly explains why you are attacking the OP but turning a blind eye to the EG narrative.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

 

DonFerrari said:
JWeinCom said:

I really don't know enough about the region to comment one way or another.   But, whether or not the historian was accurate, there was no reason to post the comments in full.  

The thing is that I don't really frequent Eurogamer, so I'm not really concerned about their reviewers.  It's just not relevant to me.  I do frequent this site, and their are quite a few topics that misrepresent information to promote an anti-SJW agenda, so that does concern me.  

So the anti-SJW concerns you more than the shenanigans of the SJW and their thrive to make government involve and censor everything they don't like??

That certainly explains why you are attacking the OP but turning a blind eye to the EG narrative.

That's absolutely not what I said.  In any way shape or form, which is kind of what I mean by people misrepresenting things on this site.  



Around the Network
JWeinCom said: 
DonFerrari said:

So the anti-SJW concerns you more than the shenanigans of the SJW and their thrive to make government involve and censor everything they don't like??

That certainly explains why you are attacking the OP but turning a blind eye to the EG narrative.

That's absolutely not what I said.  In any way shape or form, which is kind of what I mean by people misrepresenting things on this site.  

You said you are worried about the anti-SJW agenda: check

You said you aren't worried about the one making the SJW agenda: check

You said you aren't worried about the accuracy of the historian: check

You said you are worried about the OP showing only the direct quotes that favored him: check.

So what interpretation that you are more aggravated by the anti-SJW than you are by the SJW is wrong?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Ka-pi96 said:
DonFerrari said:
I'll complain about all the games set in feudal Japan that doesn't show European people or people talking in Portuguese while being christian... because we know Portugal had influenced Japan, had some possibility of offspring and taught their language.

So I demand a quota of Portuguese people in all japan based games after the middle age.

From the middle ages? Stop being racist! Japan based games should have Portuguese people from the very foundation of Japan. There's no evidence that there weren't Portuguese people wandering around Japan back then so we might as well assume they were!

You have a good point.

Also since theories of human origin is from Africa and we all have DNA from there and we don't have pictures from prior to 1900 I demand that all games from before 1900 have only black people, since you can't prove everyone wasn't dark skinned =]

 

And also since Portuguese used slaves and there is one drawing of a dark skinned samurai, I think all samurai games Nioh and Tsushijima included need some black main player.

Last edited by DonFerrari - on 22 February 2018

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

DonFerrari said:
JWeinCom said: 

That's absolutely not what I said.  In any way shape or form, which is kind of what I mean by people misrepresenting things on this site.  

You said you are worried about the anti-SJW agenda: check

You said you aren't worried about the one making the SJW agenda: check

You said you aren't worried about the accuracy of the historian: check

You said you are worried about the OP showing only the direct quotes that favored him: check.

So what interpretation that you are more aggravated by the anti-SJW than you are by the SJW is wrong?

1.  I didn't say I was worried about the anti-sjw agenda.  I said I was bothered by people who misrepresent information to support it.  If people were presenting information honestly, I'd have no real objections.

2.  And I said why I wasn't concerned about it.  Has nothing to do with whether or not I agree with their stande, it's just that I don't visit their website.  There are billions of websites.  I only tend to worry about the ones I actually use.

3.  I don't believe I said that at all. I said I didn't have enough information to comment on that.  I'd rather it be accurate, but I'm certainly not about to do any indepth research on the Czech republic in the 1600s. 

4.  Yup.  You got that one right.

So, what I was saying was, I care more about people misrepresenting information to support an anti-sjw agenda on a site I use (btw, I'd be equally bothered if people were doing so to promote a pro-sjw agenda, but I just don't see much of that here), and that I don't care about what people say on a website I never use.

You somehow got from there to I'm worried about any anti-sjw stuff whether honestly presented or not, and that I'm more concerned about this than people trying to get everything censored, which is a topic I never addressed at all.

I trust that if you are making an effort in good faith to understand me you will stand corrected.

Last edited by JWeinCom - on 22 February 2018

I thought this was a joke until I read it through...

But now that I've seen this, I am deeply offended and shaken to my core!!! I demand that my ethnicity is better represented in all games, or else you are blocking my basic human rights and I will sue you for xbox currency!

In all seriousness, my comment above makes about as much sense as what the author of the article stated. I could care less that there aren't black people in a game, and it really shouldn't matter to the author of this article either.

Last edited by barneystinson69 - on 22 February 2018

Made a bet with LipeJJ and HylianYoshi that the XB1 will reach 30 million before Wii U reaches 15 million. Loser has to get avatar picked by winner for 6 months (or if I lose, either 6 months avatar control for both Lipe and Hylian, or my patrick avatar comes back forever).

JWeinCom said:
DonFerrari said:

You said you are worried about the anti-SJW agenda: check

You said you aren't worried about the one making the SJW agenda: check

You said you aren't worried about the accuracy of the historian: check

You said you are worried about the OP showing only the direct quotes that favored him: check.

So what interpretation that you are more aggravated by the anti-SJW than you are by the SJW is wrong?

1.  I didn't say I was worried about the anti-sjw agenda.  I said I was bothered by people who misrepresent information to support it.  If people were presenting information honestly, I'd have no real objections.

2.  And I said why I wasn't concerned about it.  Has nothing to do with whether or not I agree with their stande, it's just that I don't visit their website.  There are billions of websites.  I only tend to worry about the ones I actually use.

3.  I don't believe I said that at all. I said I didn't have enough information to comment on that.  I'd rather it be accurate, but I'm certainly not about to do any indepth research on the Czech republic in the 1600s. 

4.  Yup.  You got that one right.

So, what I was saying was, I care more about people misrepresenting information to support an anti-sjw agenda on a site I use (btw, I'd be equally bothered if people were doing so to promote a pro-sjw agenda, but I just don't see much of that here), and that I don't care about what people say on a website I never use.

You somehow got from there to I'm worried about any anti-sjw stuff whether honestly presented or not, and that I'm more concerned about this than people trying to get everything censored, which is a topic I never addressed at all.

I trust that if you are making an effort in good faith to understand me you will stand corrected.

1 - So are you worried about the reviewer that is misrepresenting and interpreting the game to fulfill a SJW agenda?

2- I really don't think there is more than one website for every 7 habitants on earth.

3 - So you are worried about the historian being correct, but not enough to care and check as you did OP?

You should follow more topics in this site, as there is a lot of pro-SJW stuff and distortions to support it in several posts and topics. But if you haven't seem ok, since you don't like both distortions I'm ok.

I got to it based on your answers and portrayal, so even though it was a hyperbole (exaggerating to show it doesn't make sense, I believe it is called reduction to ridiculum), but yes I stand corrected.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."