At the very least, I wouldnt blame if the UN did it.
My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.
https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1
A pre-emptive strike against North Korea? | |||
Avoid loss of human lives at all costs! | 128 | 28.64% | |
NK will never use those w... | 147 | 32.89% | |
We should stop them befor... | 71 | 15.88% | |
We should stop NK before NK causes a tragedy. | 101 | 22.60% | |
Total: | 447 |
At the very least, I wouldnt blame if the UN did it.
My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.
https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1
p0isonparadise said: I want a nuclear war to break out. |
I doubt is gonna be any way as cool as in Mad Max and Fallout games so I see the temptation of the idea but then realize the delusion. :P
Nintendo is selling their IPs to Microsoft and this is true because:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=221391&page=1
No, because China won't tolerate that and such an action might have dire consequences eve though they will be mostly economical.
Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar
AbbathTheGrim said:
The thing though is that nobody knows exactly what NK's Kim wants, but some of the previous demands from NK are that the US leaves the region and that NK wants an unified Korea. If de-escalating the situation is entering negotiations that lead the US to leave there, nothing is stopping NK from threatening an invasion of the South by menace of nuclear warfare. I am all up for negotations that will make this Kim guy happy and stop with the threats, but if what he wants is for the US to disappear from the region and gain power there and maybe even allow China to have more power there, that would be bad for our allies and I doubt the US will agree to any of it. So I suppose the only answer would be to not do anything, get used to threats and hope for the best. |
What North Korean officials want is for the regime to survive. They want to make threats, then have negotiations that will try to ensure that. They don't want a war that will surely end them.
Nautilus said: At the very least, I wouldnt blame if the UN did it. |
That would be preferable since China is cool with it than. If not I would like to avoid WW3 starting in South East Asia.
Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar
AbbathTheGrim said:
I doubt is gonna be any way as cool as in Mad Max and Fallout games so I see the temptation of the idea but then realize the delusion. :P |
The Nuclear winter should solve our global warming problem though ;)
Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar
AbbathTheGrim said:
I doubt is gonna be any way as cool as in Mad Max and Fallout games so I see the temptation of the idea but then realize the delusion. :P |
WW3 or a nuclear war is going to happen eventually, might as well get it over and done with.
CaptainExplosion said:
It'll start there anyway if we don't kill fatso and his legion of psychotic retards. |
China has stated very clearly that it will withdraw any form of support if NK chooses to strike a target. So it will be effectively 200 countries vs 1. So that will be a very quick world war, with a low number of casualties. Although WW3 will start there due to a higer demand than availability of food and frsh water in the region. Since that corner of the world is very much overcrowded and poluted. I will give it another 75 years at best before those countries will attack eachother.
Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar
Mar1217 said:
Hah ... that commentary is just disgusting to be honest, but if I were to suggest my opinion, people would only go in the way of saying that's a necessary evil. Anyway, even with the demonstration of their "power", I'm pretty sure they won't even try cuz as VGP said, it would be the beginning of their demise, and I'm pretty sure their "o great leader" wants to keep his place in his dystopian society, so might as well look good in appearance but do nothing otherwise. |
I didn't even bring up the "communist pigs" part myself But it shows just what he thinks of the North Korean civilians I guess, he doesn't view them as humans, he views them as pigs so it's OK to kill them.
Kim surely has to realise that no matter how far he catches up to the rest of the world with respect to defense technologies, he can never win. He may be a crazy dictator, but he still wants to make sure that his position remains and that it's comfortable/low risk as possible.
This is all a facade, in order to scare the world into responding with a "oh yes sir, we respect you now ... Now, how much money/resources would you like?" Of course this won't happen, but it's the end game that he has to play for. There's no other way, the PDRK would eventually fall, it's just a matter of time in this modern and highly connected world.
If violence is the only answer in the end, it should only be directed at a small handful of people. It would undoubtedly spill over to more than just that, but large scale warfare isn't the way.
Just my two cents :)