People who treat exclusive as a positive point.

People who won't play anything that scores lower than a 9.0.

Also, people who dismiss games entirely just because they're on handheld. Because there's NO WAY a handheld game can be good.

People who act like smartphone gaming and handheld gaming are the exact same thing, saying stuff like, "Why buy a handheld game for $40 when smartphone games are 99 cents!"

And people who just dismiss handhelds altogether as inferior platforms. Whenever they make sales lists of consoles, handhelds are never included for some reason, etc. (never understood that), they call the Switch a handheld like it's an insult, etc, etc...

This thread is making me gloomy.

I don't really care for people reviewing games from genres they don't like. Their strong bias defeats the point of the review. That goes for professional or user reviews.

I also don't like digital only gamers who push for all gaming to become digital only. Fuck that idiocy.

When people who will ignore a game because it is not AAA, because it has not been marketed enough.

On that note people who watch Irate Gamer. :P I'm kidding. Seriously tho the guy knows nothing about games. When he started that channel he admitted he just bought a bunch of old games fro the channel but wasn't a gamer. He also plagerised Angry Video Game Nerds content. I mean he stole AVGN's footage and used it as his own including that TMNT video. His mom is his social warrior on Youtube...she's insane as is he. It's probably best you don't give that guy your time.

Give it to IGSRJ instead! My favourite angry-game reviewer:

People who only play F2P games and said they are a dedicated hardcore gamer.

I do find it weird when people choose not to play a game when it lacks achievements, discredit games because they're indie, and call a game childish because it uses cartoony visuals.

Are you talking about Kapi in particular?