potato_hamster said:
zorg1000 said:
Nobody said it doesnt affect you, nobody cares that it affects you, that has nothing to do with the convo.
The reason you gave for it being a handheld makes no damn sense whatsoever or in other words got debunked.
Not being able to charge while playing has nothing to do with a device being a console, portable or hybrid.
|
Is this like a generational thing where people think they can just change the definition of words at their leisure? If I'm not mistaken Zorg, you have like 3 kids, which means you're probably around my age, and definitely means you should know better.
Who said anything about it "affecting me" until you brought it up. Not being able to charge while playing is actually evidence that indicates that Nintendo designed the Switch primarily as a handheld. Sure, alone, it's not very strong evidence at all, but nowhere did I say that this alone proves it.
Tell me, if the Switch shipped with a pro controller instead of a pair of joycons, meaning out of the box, it could not be used as a handheld, do you think that would change how Nintendo is conveying to the customer how the Switch is intended to be used? A simple yes or no answer is all that is needed.
|
What words am i changing the meaning of? This is what you said in your last post
"You just think it's a non-issue because it's never been an issue for you."
Arent something affecting you and something being an issue pretty much the same thing? Seems like you are arguing semantics.
Those are not at all the same thing so im not going to give you a yes or no answer for that. If a 100% dedicated home console has the same issue than it is illogical to use that same issue to argue that something is a handheld.
Also im actually quite a bit younger than you, only 26, my wife and i wanted kids young.