| BraLoD said: What I'm saying is that, there is a clear point that is holding it some points down, and if it was removed, with being a normally developed game, the score would definitely be higher, as would lack those complants and deductions. |
And I disagree with that notion, but the "what if" scenarios are such a muddy, hypotetical ground that shouldn't be presented as anything, because I might as well say "if they were removed, critics would find something else to focus their complains on" and I'd argue as such that it wouldn't get that lot of perfect scores you claim. And since it's a what if scenario, good luck trying to disprove it. 
We need to work with what we have right now. And what we have right now is what I just said back there. Great game whose uniqueness itself is a source of complain by some, and by some I mean almost half the critics right now. Then there are the technical issues, but outside patches, not much can be said about them at the moment, and since I haven't grasped the game I don't know how bad they are. Could be serious problems, could be critics blowing it out of proportions.
