Final-Fan on 15 October 2016
Machina said:
People in here saying it's Trump that's unstable and unpredictable, but it's Hillary that keeps ramping up the rhetoric re Russia, and she's the more hawkish of the two, having supported the variuous wars in the ME that have gotten us into the shitty situation we're in today with militant Islam on the rise. If you believe a new war with Russia is conceivable then I'd be more worried about what happens when she wins than if Trump wins.
|
The problem is that Clinton being the more hawkish of the two doesn't necessarily mean that she is more likely to start a war with Russia in my mind. I think Clinton will be very aware of what she is doing in regard to foreign policy and the likely results of her actions. That's not to say she will never make mistakes, but she has a lot of experience dealing with Russia. I believe she can take a hard line stance on issues without getting into armed conflict. I do not trust Trump to not aggravate a tense situation and potentially get into an avoidable armed conflict. He seems to treat things in a binary way, from what I've heard, where you are either a friend or an enemy with precious little room in between; and when you are an enemy he responds with lots of threats and bluster. In other words, he is not a good diplomat.