Quantcast
How Do Hillary Clinton Feminist Supporters reconcile her record of attacking/intimdating ....

Forums - Politics Discussion - How Do Hillary Clinton Feminist Supporters reconcile her record of attacking/intimdating ....

alledged rape victems of her husband as well as women he has had sex with (while he was married to Hillary) that go public about it? 

Going back to his 1st campaign for President: Hillary went on the news show 60 Minutes and said she was "no stand by your man kind of gal"  when asked about her husbands affairs-  This made many people mad so she made a big deal about making home made cookies, dressed like a matronly mom/wife supporting her husband   etc  for a while to try to win back the Tammy Wynette fans, among others she upset-

Hillary has a long record of trying to discredit/attack Bill s "Rodeo Queens" , even the women that have accused him of rape-  There is a public record of this and even the Washingto Post article (linked to the article i am linking below) does not try to deny it as much as "recast" her actions in a better light  (The Washington Post article is "Enabler or Family Defender"). 

Conidering the support  of super sensitive feminists, sjw s etc is heavily pro Hillary, how do they reconcile her actions like "slut shaming", attacking, intimting,  discrediting of these women/potential victims? -   The type of behavior that Hillary is known for towards these women,  is the  epitome of the type of beavior  that  is considered wrong by not only feminists but most people in general. 

http://www.weeklystandard.com/hillary-and-the-rodeo-queens/article/2004640



Around the Network

Because women know women. They don't like it when a man (Trump) tries to define how a woman should behave. He's not a woman, and was never cheated on by a man. So from their perspective, it's insulting.



How? As always, by ignoring it.



bet: lost

Feminists, SJWs etc defend any behaviour from people on their side, no matter how reprehensible, and yet go after the most minute things imaginable on people who they consider against them



pray4mojo said:

Because women know women. They don't like it when a man (Trump) tries to define how a woman should behave. He's not a woman, and was never cheated on by a man. So from their perspective, it's insulting.

What are you talking about?  did you read the OP?  the linked article-

the TLDR version:  how do feminists, SJW s and similar minded people reconcile their support of a woman (Hillary) who has a long  track record of "slut shaming", attacking and discrediting women who have either accussed her husbad of rape and/or been public about having slept w him (whie he was married to Hillary) ??   Pretty straight forward question-



Around the Network
Dunban67 said:
pray4mojo said:

Because women know women. They don't like it when a man (Trump) tries to define how a woman should behave. He's not a woman, and was never cheated on by a man. So from their perspective, it's insulting.

What are you talking about?  did you read the OP?  the linked article-

the TLDR version:  how do feminists, SJW s and similar minded people reconcile their support of a woman (Hillary) who has a long  track record of "slut shaming", attacking and discrediting women who have either accussed her husbad of rape and/or been public about having slept w him (whie he was married to Hillary) ??   Pretty straight forward question-

Your question is "How do Hillary Clinton Supporters reconcile her record of attacking/intemdating". I answered that. Most women don't like men telling them how they should behave, feel, act etc. Trump has never been a married woman who's married to a powerful man so from their point of view, nothing he says matters. It's instantly invalid.

Plus, even if something he said was valid, the man has been such a pig to women his whole life that there's just no way any of them would take him seriously. Trump shaming people for being "bad" to women is like a KKK member shaming someone for being racist. 



pray4mojo said:
Dunban67 said:

What are you talking about?  did you read the OP?  the linked article-

the TLDR version:  how do feminists, SJW s and similar minded people reconcile their support of a woman (Hillary) who has a long  track record of "slut shaming", attacking and discrediting women who have either accussed her husbad of rape and/or been public about having slept w him (whie he was married to Hillary) ??   Pretty straight forward question-

Your question is "How do Hillary Clinton Supporters reconcile her record of attacking/intemdating". I answered that. Most women don't like men telling them how they should behave, feel, act etc. Trump has never been a married woman who's married to a powerful man so from their point of view, nothing he says matters. It's instantly invalid.

Plus, even if something he said was valid, the man has been such a pig to women his whole life that there's just no way any of them would take him seriously. Trump shaming people for being "bad" to women is like a KKK member shaming someone for being racist. 

So they ignore her actions,  maybe put their head in the sand  because they don t like someone else more? 

Or a Woman can treat another woman poorly becasue a man can t?  

And:  Feminists and SJW s think some men have treated women in ways  they do not agree- So they "look past" Hillary s harsh treatment of these women- 

It is OK for her to "slut shame", discredit etc  becasue there are men that have done it as well?

Did I understand your answer correctly?-  and thanks for responding

 

 

 



Dunban67 said:
pray4mojo said:

Your question is "How do Hillary Clinton Supporters reconcile her record of attacking/intemdating". I answered that. Most women don't like men telling them how they should behave, feel, act etc. Trump has never been a married woman who's married to a powerful man so from their point of view, nothing he says matters. It's instantly invalid.

Plus, even if something he said was valid, the man has been such a pig to women his whole life that there's just no way any of them would take him seriously. Trump shaming people for being "bad" to women is like a KKK member shaming someone for being racist. 

So they ignore her actions,  maybe put their head in the sand  because they don t like someone else more? 

Or a Woman can treat another woman poorly becasue a man can t?  

And:  Feminists and SJW s think some men have treated women in ways  they do not agree- So they "look past" Hillary s harsh treatment of these women- 

It is OK for her to "slut shame", discredit etc  becasue there are men that have done it as well?

Did I understand your answer correctly?-  and thanks for responding

 

 

 

That's what I understood also. 



l <---- Do you mean this glitch Gribble?  If not, I'll keep looking.  

 

 

 

 

I am on the other side of my sig....am I warm or cold?  

Marco....

Because, as has been the case with much of what we have seen from this election, this isn't a matter of 6 of one or half a dozen of another.

First. I imagine most people don't know most of the story when it comes to Hillary and Bills accusers. As mentioned in the article you linked, there hasn't been much media coverage of them (though I would look for a more reputable source before I took that article as all true).

Then, there's the Donald Trump issue. He hasn't shown himself to respect women either in his policies or his life, so why would they believe that he cares about their issues?

Essentially it bowls down to many people not knowing about this, and Donald Trump being way, way worse.



Bet with Adamblaziken:

I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.

Feminists are retarded.

User moderated -RavenXtra