I don't think I've ever seen anyone claiming that, I mean its completely clear which is the better port.

Quick question from someone who has played every console Zelda title except TP and SS. I owned TP on Wii when it launched, played to about the first dungeon, then quit because I hated the forced waggle. I never got the Gamecube version (sadly). I haven't played further than that. For those who have beaten it, how does it compare to OOT? What is the biggest difference between the two? OOT is my favorite 3D Zelda, and I always wondered if I should play TP since it LOOKS similar but I just never have.

Stop being so unrealistic, do you expect them to do a full remake of the game now? Dont you realize that would be almost as expensive as a new whole zelda game? It makes sense for you to waste years of some of the main Nintendo studios and dozens of milions in a remake of twilight princess?? Because I rather that effort put into another thing, like the new zelda or the next Metroid, but not TP.

As a remaster is as good as it can be, and has way way way more changes from the original than the average remaster, so i dont see why is not worth 50$, is not up to you to decide that, when I go to see a movie I pay always the same price independently of how was the budget of the film or the time they needed to film it, so I dont understand why people gives always so much importance about that in videogames, is the product worth it? Thats the question, and nothing else more, does the people thinks a full remaster of TPHD with all the improvements they have done is worth 50$? Sales and public reception will give us the aswer, but I would say is a big YES.

Some people also ignoring that WW has timeless art style that aged great, while that isnt case with TP, that is one of main reasons why WW HD looks better than TP HD.

Also, TP cant look better on dolphin because its same game in just higher resolution, while TP HD except resolution bump also has complete overhauled of textures, better shadows and lighting, post-process and anti-aliasing.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2016-legend-of-zelda-twilight-princess-hd-face-off

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2016-zelda-twilight-princess-on-wii-u-is-even-better-than-we-remember-it

Just wait, there are those who'll actually try to say it got just as much of a graphical overhaul.

Well, I'm not one to disappoint so yeah, I'll say it:  the *technical* upgrade is comparable, it's just the visual difference is less consistently apparent.  Wind Waker got lighting, yes.  However, the texture resolution is not nearly as high as TPHD cause it doesn't need to be.  Also, not a single mesh of WWHD was touched and they remain very very low in poly counts even in areas where upgrades were obviously possible.  TPHD on the other hand has seen geometry enhancement throughout every single interior including dungeons.  The only area where WWHD trumps TPHD is lighting.  And that is it.  Textures are crisper but not nearly as good on a technical level, geometry was untouched.  The main reason the visual upgrade is not as significant is the art style of WWHD, which means low geometry and simplistic textures can skate, freeing resources for the lighting improvements.  Just saying, the idea WWHD is a huge, massive overhaul and TPHD is a cheap, splapdash effort is just that: a myth.  Neither is a massive overhaul, neither is slapdash.