he is right about how going to the middle east destabilized the region, and how the W.O.M. was all bullshit lies to go to war.

I will probably just vote for whoever is against the slaughtering of babies in the womb, despite any of his/her deficiencies.

I'm not sure if you're joking it's that ridiculous.

That's not the way real-life works. Unless the Mexicans get something spectacular in return, they won't pay a cent. It's a pipe dream. Getting the media to back and pay for a political campaign isn't comparable to international politics.  

I sincerly believe that Bush thought, based on agency intelligence, that there were W.O.M.s there. Satalite images are difficult things to see clearly and sometimes you have to go with your gut. He was wrong in that case, but what he wasn't wrong about was Hussain violating international law and committing a genocide on his own people with chemical weapons (even if they weren't W.O.M.). Do we just sit around and allow some guy to slaughter people randomly, because it isn't our business, or do we go there and try to protect/free these people? Yes, I understand that ISIS and AL Queda and all the other radical islamic terrorists are, in many ways, far worse than just one crazy dictator, but 1) we had no way of knowing that we were going to trigger with people that are brainwashed and 2) it's difficult to resist the moral obligation to at least TRY to do something to help people when they are dying. I, truly, wouldn't have known what would have been the best response to it. I wouldn't trust myself or any other human to deal with that type of situation, but Bush HAD to deal with it and he chose what was his gut instinct.

Trump is right about this, but I certainly wouldn't trust him about running his country. And really he's just stating obvious facts, so this isn't all that impressive...

I'm sorry, but the Democratic Party is too corrupt and wont allow Bernie Sanders to become the Democratic nominee.  

Bush has run over $20 million of negative ads against Trump. Doesn't Trump have the right to fight back?

Yep. Not Donald Trump!

NAFTA is an executive agreement. Congressional action on NAFTA has permitted the President to enter into these agreements. This means that the President has the authority to renegotiate these agreements under the trade acts passed by Congress in the 70's and 80's.

NAFTA has no expiration date but it must be periodically renegotiated. NAFTA benefits Mexico and big business in the USA and Donald Trump would be in a huge position to put Mexico in a vice over it. Mexico would gladly build a wall with their NAFTA trade surplus.

And bear in mind that he would have the backing of the AFL-CIO on this issue which may effect a massive Republican landslide in the general election. Trump is on the verge of becoming an unstoppable juggernaut.

When he says there will be a big, beautiful wall you'd better believe him.

To be fair, they are both awful.

Though i must laugh at Jeb thinking he could get points off his brother's presidency. He made that bed.