By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Captain Obvious: Zelda Wii U is a Wii U exclusive

I want to believe.

 



Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see

So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"

Around the Network
Gamemaster87 said:
Conina said:

But maybe 2017 is PS4's peak year... or 2018. Shall Nintendo delay the NX launch until 2019 then? And all the 2015 and 2016 games for PS4 and Xbox One don't suddenly disappear in 2017, NX has to go against bigger and bigger game libraries the longer Nintendo waits.

Nintendo can't compete in this Generation anymore. The train has already left the station and they didn't jump aboard it.

There aim has to be to get people buying the console as a secodary console. And then prepare with it for the next generation.

As late as possible - far away from PS4's peak year.

If there are more people with the choice between PS4 and NX, then it will be bad for Nintendo.

More and more people interested in a console will already have chosen in 2017 or 2018 if Nintendo doesn't try to stay relevant next year, only a fraction of the gamers will buy two or all three consoles of a generation. Settling for the "secondary console" target group won't work well and won't bring third party support back.



Gamemaster87 said:
Mummelmann said:


I think it's pretty much only one person now.

There was even one moron who suggested on the 13th of December 2013 that; "I think there's a fairly big chance we could see a new Nintendo around 2016."

Some people just don't get it.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5891288

Yeah. You don't get it.

Why are you so obsessed with this anyway? What difference does it make when the NX comes? And why should anyone listen to one person on an anonymous forum in the ocean of evidence and pointers towards the contrary?
You tell people not to believe what they read and hear, yet you tell them that you're right, just because you say so.
I think I do get it, the 8th gen has progressed almost exactly like I said it would a couple of years back, with some exceptions, of course.
Where on earth does a person get an attitude like this?

Saying things like "It would be completely dumb to release the next home console in 2016. We discussed that before." to simply disqualify everyone and everything going against you is ridiculous; as if your word alone can cut down any semblance of discussion on the matter.
" And I said it before: thr next home console launch in late 2017. That's almost fact. Deal with it." There is literally not a shred of evidence for this, there's only your personal conviction, which isn't exactly water-tight as fact or proof.

"Probably because the majority in this community believes every shit on the internet. Don't trust those people. These leakers a lifeless idiots. Don't gibe them the attention they want. Be a smart person :)"

And you, of course, are a smart person, far smarter than me or anyone else here who don't agree. You have the most illogical and backwards arguments I've seen since late last year and early this year, when a few of the good old dudes were still rampaging on the forums with posts going totally in the face of everything and everyone with not so much as a smidge of evidence or grounded reasoning.

"And you're talking like you were some sort of prophet who talks about NX to come in 2016. Just saying. You don't know, I don't know. And the pointers you see may mean nothing."

And the (non-existant) pointers you see mean everything, obviously.

"As I said. On NX in 2017. Learn reading mate."

Because your word is law, apparently. Who are you anyway? This is ridiculous.

You're making about 0% sense in here, there is not one single indicator on this globe of what you're claiming, besides your claims in and on themselves.



Metroid33slayer said:

 

Gamemaster87 said:

 

 

Then at E3 2017 they will show their new home console in detail (I expect them to talk about its concept in 2016) and announce a port/remaster of the game for this new console. They can get people buying their next console if they don't own a Wii U + they can get people who own a Wii U want to get this port. In the end they will sell more units of the game than with a Wii U/next home console simultaneous release in 2016. Let's say 6 million on the new console. Just think about it: Twilight Princess on Gamecube hasn't even sold 2 million units. Now assume it would have been a Gamecube exclusive for ~one year. It would have sold at least 4 million units on Gamecube alone.  aThen Nintendo would have released the Wii and the Twilight Princess port as a launch title. I expect that it would have sold 7 million units on Wii. What I wanted to say is that Twilight Princess could have been even more successful if Nintendo would have released it in the right way.

 

No way would the wii version have sold just over 7 million if the game was released on gamecube in 2005.

PosGamePlatformYearGenrePublisherNorth AmericaEuropeJapanRest of WorldGlobal
2 The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess Wii 2006 Action Nintendo 3.77 2.13 0.60 0.68 7.17
19 The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess GC 2006 Action Nintendo 1.15 0.36 0.04 0.04 1.59

The split is 7.17m to 1.59m in favour of wii. The wii version sold 3m in it's first year so take those sales away and at them to the gamecube version. so we would have the gc version at 4.59m and the wii version at 4.17m, This is what i would expect if the gamecube had a year long headstart.

No, that's wrong. As I said this would have no longer been the Twilight Princess case but the The Last of Us case. Many people bought the remastered version one year later and it would have been the same with the Wii version of Twilight Princess if it would got released a year later.

And it's also wrong that those 3 million are the sales that got taken away from the GCN version because not everybody who bought Twilight Princess for Wii at launch had a Gamecube. 



Conina said:
Gamemaster87 said:

Nintendo can't compete in this Generation anymore. The train has already left the station and they didn't jump aboard it.

There aim has to be to get people buying the console as a secodary console. And then prepare with it for the next generation.

As late as possible - far away from PS4's peak year.

If there are more people with the choice between PS4 and NX, then it will be bad for Nintendo.

More and more people interested in a console will already have chosen in 2017 or 2018 if Nintendo doesn't try to stay relevant next year, only a fraction of the gamers will buy two or all three consoles of a generation. Settling for the "secondary console" target group won't work well and won't bring third party support back.

So, Nintendo will be more relevant when people choose a PS4 over NX in 2016? Doesn't make sense mate. They need to go away from these choices and have to make sure that there's no other choice than getting a NX because they already own a PS4. And it would work better than just throwing out a console and get bashed by the PS4.

Third Party support returns when Nintendo supports them more and makes it easier for them to develop for their consoles. If Nintendo sell their console successfully, which happens if you target people who already own another console (secondary console), Third Parties will fully return as their software will sell at least profitable.



Around the Network
Mummelmann said:
Gamemaster87 said:
Mummelmann said:


I think it's pretty much only one person now.

There was even one moron who suggested on the 13th of December 2013 that; "I think there's a fairly big chance we could see a new Nintendo around 2016."

Some people just don't get it.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5891288

Yeah. You don't get it.

Why are you so obsessed with this anyway? What difference does it make when the NX comes? And why should anyone listen to one person on an anonymous forum in the ocean of evidence and pointers towards the contrary?
You tell people not to believe what they read and hear, yet you tell them that you're right, just because you say so.
I think I do get it, the 8th gen has progressed almost exactly like I said it would a couple of years back, with some exceptions, of course.
Where on earth does a person get an attitude like this?

Saying things like "It would be completely dumb to release the next home console in 2016. We discussed that before." to simply disqualify everyone and everything going against you is ridiculous; as if your word alone can cut down any semblance of discussion on the matter.
" And I said it before: thr next home console launch in late 2017. That's almost fact. Deal with it." There is literally not a shred of evidence for this, there's only your personal conviction, which isn't exactly water-tight as fact or proof.

"Probably because the majority in this community believes every shit on the internet. Don't trust those people. These leakers a lifeless idiots. Don't gibe them the attention they want. Be a smart person :)"

And you, of course, are a smart person, far smarter than me or anyone else here who don't agree. You have the most illogical and backwards arguments I've seen since late last year and early this year, when a few of the good old dudes were still rampaging on the forums with posts going totally in the face of everything and everyone with not so much as a smidge of evidence or grounded reasoning.

"And you're talking like you were some sort of prophet who talks about NX to come in 2016. Just saying. You don't know, I don't know. And the pointers you see may mean nothing."

And the (non-existant) pointers you see mean everything, obviously.

"As I said. On NX in 2017. Learn reading mate."

Because your word is law, apparently. Who are you anyway? This is ridiculous.

You're making about 0% sense in here, there is not one single indicator on this globe of what you're claiming, besides your claims in and on themselves.

And why should I believe you then? Your comment doesn't make sense in any way.

There are pointers in the other direction and if you would read my posts you would see that. Your pointers mean nothing.

I just don't trust every shit on the internet. I use my own brain and don't repeat that what one said and what the others say. I think about what could really happen.

And if you don't accept what I said as evidence for a 2017 release, where's the evidence for a 2016 release then? There's none, right.

Maybe the number of evidence for a 2016 release would be negative then.

 

I'm just stating the more probably things. If you don't understand that you should probably leave this thread. Thanky you.



Gamemaster87 said:
maxleresistant said:

Right now I don't ses any reason why the NX would not come out by the end of 2016.
Production is already lined up, ghey already started to give informations to developpers (hello DQ XII). Also, we can all agree that besides Zelda WiiU and starfox, two games that are late, Internal development of wiiu/3ds software has stopped at Nintendo. All the 3DS games for 2016 are games that are already finished and released in japan. Do you really think that Nintendo is not going to release anything besides Zelda on WiiU for the second half of 2016? They have nothing else on sight for WiiU/3ds. And yes, normally, a year before they always have a few games announced.
What do you think they are doing exactly? Do you think they are going to have two dead systems next Christmas?

Please explain to me why it is impossible for the NX to be out in 2016? Indulge me.

Nx will be out by the end of 2016, and Zelda NX too. You don't have to trust me. Just wait and see

You said it yourself: All announced 3DS Games are already out in Japan. Nintendo doesn't develop new 3DS games anymore. It will obviously get a replacement first. 

For Wii U we have:

-Zelda

-Star Fox

-Pokken

-Twilight Princess HD

All big titles that don't indicate the last year of a console. Look at Wii's 2012 LineUp or Gamecube's 2006. Wii U's is different -> not Wii U's last year. And there are many other reasons I explained before. Just go through the other posts.

Wii U will get new game announcements until and at E3 2016 for the rest of 2016 and early 2017. 3DS won't get any new announcements. Rather they will announce at E3 2016 the successor's launch titles.

And neither NX nor Zelda NX (which doesn't exist anyway) will be out in 2016. You'll find it out by yourself next year.


you are working on the assumption that the nx will only be a home console. It will not be just that. The 3DS and the WiiU will be replaced by the end of next year



Gamemaster87 said:

They need to go away from these choices and have to make sure that there's no other choice than getting a NX because they already own a PS4. And it would work better than just throwing out a console and get bashed by the PS4.

Nintendo can't "go away from these choices" and "make sure that there's no other choice than getting a NX"... there will always be choices. Why shouldn't PS4 and Xbox One and their huge game libraries be a valid choice anymore in 2017 or 2018 against NX? They will still get most AAA-titles of these years.

And waiting until the peak years of the competition have passed worked great for the Wii U, didn't it? Eventually it had 4 other home consoles (PS3 + 360 + PS4 + XBO) as competitors/choices instead of only 2.



Gamemaster87 said:

Probably because the majority in this community believes every shit on the internet. Don't trust those people. These leakers a lifeless idiots. Don't gibe them the attention they want. Be a smart person :)

And I don't get it why people still believe there will be a Twilight Princess situation. If you would have read my post you would know that this certainly won't happen. Nintendo is a economic company that wants to make profit. It's not a company that wants to fullfill the dreams of some weird people of this community. They will do what's best for them and that is what I described.


It has nothing to do with leakers, it has to do with statements from Iwata such as saying they plan to redefine gaming in about 2 years back in May of 2014. And it has to do with the development cycles of major Nintendo teams.



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.

maxleresistant said:
Gamemaster87 said:

You said it yourself: All announced 3DS Games are already out in Japan. Nintendo doesn't develop new 3DS games anymore. It will obviously get a replacement first. 

For Wii U we have:

-Zelda

-Star Fox

-Pokken

-Twilight Princess HD

All big titles that don't indicate the last year of a console. Look at Wii's 2012 LineUp or Gamecube's 2006. Wii U's is different -> not Wii U's last year. And there are many other reasons I explained before. Just go through the other posts.

Wii U will get new game announcements until and at E3 2016 for the rest of 2016 and early 2017. 3DS won't get any new announcements. Rather they will announce at E3 2016 the successor's launch titles.

And neither NX nor Zelda NX (which doesn't exist anyway) will be out in 2016. You'll find it out by yourself next year.


you are working on the assumption that the nx will only be a home console. It will not be just that. The 3DS and the WiiU will be replaced by the end of next year

That doesn't make economic sense and should know that. I explained that several times. Nintendo will keep producing dedicated handhelds and dedicated home consoles. and they will release them with one year in between. 

And I don't assume that the NX is the nest home console but since many in this community believe this I used NX short for "Nintendo's next home console".