Quantcast
Careful reading Halo 5 comments.

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Careful reading Halo 5 comments.

Tagged games:

Thanks for the heads up



Around the Network
ROBOTECHHEAVEN said:
Also the mcc was not as buggy as the trolls made it out to be either, sure it had some issues but no where the amount some obvious trolls were stating.....

Uhhhh Yes it was!

I played the game SOLEY for the multiplayer purpouses only. I could only get int oa match ONCE every hour-hour and a half. The networking was broken and the core purpouse of the collection for me, was missing. The game for me was a phantom. An empty game without an experince. I cannot stress at how disapointed I am with the game and it tooks them something stupid like 6 months to fix. Sorry if I am little angry about it but I've never played a game this broken in my life.

Sure I'll admit the single player experince was very well done and had no issues. However I beat those many times on my original disk. I wanted to play the multiplayer to mix up the experince of the multiplayer in glorious HD!



ROBOTECHHEAVEN said:
Also the mcc was not as buggy as the trolls made it out to be either, sure it had some issues but no where the amount some obvious trolls were stating.....


That really did depend on what part of the game you were focused on. If you were into MP it really was basically a broken product at the start (fortunately for me I didn't care about MP), if you were playing the campaigns then there were some annoying bugs but definitely no where near broken like the MP was.



Insidb said:
Snoopy said:

The worse part is all the sony fans hating on this game in the comment section.

Chalk is up as The Order: 1886 karma, especially since early reports have H5's campaign clocking in around 6 hours.

Brace yourself: deja vu is coming.


6 hours? Maybe on easy and rushing through the game/ skipping cutscenes. Everyone is saying it about 10 hours.



Insidb said:
Snoopy said:

The worse part is all the sony fans hating on this game in the comment section.

Chalk is up as The Order: 1886 karma, especially since early reports have H5's campaign clocking in around 6 hours.

Brace yourself: deja vu is coming.

Halo 5 has multiplayer.



"The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must" - Thoukydides

Around the Network

who care i finish the game already (less then 7h of gameplay on normal) and story is just ok but meh (cant spoil it).... i think it the end of halo for me.....

the game worth 30$ max (just like the order 1886)



nanarchy said:

christ grow up! I am sure people will finish it much faster than you. Just as I am sure it will take me many times longer than most people.

So responding to accusations of me lying about how long it took to complete warrants being told to "grow up"? right. 
I was dissappointed on the length because I completed it in that amount of time just playing it casually, the same as most people would, I wasn't skipping cutscenes, I wasn't sprinting through levels, just playing it normally.

After all of the articles stating the campaign was 15hr+ i feel quite well within my rights to be dissapointed by less than 7 hours, even if set to normal, i'll likely play it again on heroic when looking for the remaining 3 skulls i didn't find playing through the first time at some point in the future.

Also, i'm pretty sure the majority of people that will be playing Halo 5 will, just like me, play through it on normal too, thus my observation based on my experience with the game is a valid one, will the be people that do it in less time? yes, will there be people that put 200+ hours in to it? yes, and many many more that will put that long into the multplayer too, but as I had stated many times in the past, pvp multiplayer has never interested me, so for me the only draw was campaign.



Tachikoma said:

So responding to accusations of me lying about how long it took to complete warrants being told to "grow up"? right. 
I was dissappointed on the length because I completed it in that amount of time just playing it casually, the same as most people would, I wasn't skipping cutscenes, I wasn't sprinting through levels, just playing it normally.

After all of the articles stating the campaign was 15hr+ i feel quite well within my rights to be dissapointed by less than 7 hours, even if set to normal, i'll likely play it again on heroic when looking for the remaining 3 skulls i didn't find playing through the first time at some point in the future.

Also, i'm pretty sure the majority of people that will be playing Halo 5 will, just like me, play through it on normal too.

This is pure validation of my previous "deja vu" comment about The Order: 1886 and the perils of fanboyism. The length narrrative reared its ugly head, many days prior to release. In both instances, the opposite fan base harped on the value of length and (without warrant) dismissed the accounts of those who had already completed the game. We should just call this repeated nonsense, "The Order Effect." For those ripping you apart, karma is still a b*tch.



Insidb said:

This is pure validation of my previous "deja vu" comment about The Order: 1886 and the perils of fanboyism. The length narrrative reared its ugly head, many days prior to release. In both instances, the opposite fan base harped on the value of length and (without warrant) dismissed the accounts of those who had already completed the game. We should just call this repeated nonsense, "The Order Effect." For those ripping you apart, karma is still a b*tch.

You know, the real kicker is that the length is the only negative thought I had on the game, i was enjoying it, it just ends rather anticlimatically in a move I assume taken to act as a cliffhanger, but the way its done feels more like someone handing you a book with the last 10 pages removed.

Gameplay was good, gunplay a little dated but still enjoyable, story was fairly good, but the length is what bugged me, that and the abruptness of the transtion between playing and completing, that abruptness serves only to amplify the feeling of the games length being short.

But hey, at least it has multiplayer. (not that I will be playing it of course)



Tachikoma said:
nanarchy said:

christ grow up! I am sure people will finish it much faster than you. Just as I am sure it will take me many times longer than most people.

So responding to accusations of me lying about how long it took to complete warrants being told to "grow up"? right. 
I was dissappointed on the length because I completed it in that amount of time just playing it casually, the same as most people would, I wasn't skipping cutscenes, I wasn't sprinting through levels, just playing it normally.

After all of the articles stating the campaign was 15hr+ i feel quite well within my rights to be dissapointed by less than 7 hours, even if set to normal, i'll likely play it again on heroic when looking for the remaining 3 skulls i didn't find playing through the first time at some point in the future.

Also, i'm pretty sure the majority of people that will be playing Halo 5 will, just like me, play through it on normal too, thus my observation based on my experience with the game is a valid one, will the be people that do it in less time? yes, will there be people that put 200+ hours in to it? yes, and many many more that will put that long into the multplayer too, but as I had stated many times in the past, pvp multiplayer has never interested me, so for me the only draw was campaign.


WTF? please point to anything I said that accused you of lying? I merely commented on the fact you played on normal and were disappointed in length, playing on normal is really a way to skip through these games fast, and as you have played previous ones I would have thought you would be aware of that.  if that is what you like then great, but it seems disengenuous to then complain about it being short.