Fuck diversity and everything it stands for (which is usually nothing)

A culture is bound to the specific people it comes from. Once it starts to change due to outside cirmustances, it is no longer the original culture, and thus, not a culture at all.

Go try to preach that shit to some countries and regions that are nowhere near diverse like Europe is, like Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran and Japan. I can already see the beautiful diversity flourish in Teheran and Islamabad once the enlightend, morally superior progressive lefties of the west start enforcing it.

Yeps. And the pictures that I have seen are even worse - good food and amenities thrashed all around.

As for the for so called "refugees crisis in Europe".

Few theses: 1) it's going to be worse in coming years, further destabilization of the Near East is the main factor (in creation of which certain political cicrles of EU and European nations have put their hands on btw); 2) the problem is not they're Muslims or different in another way, even though that is nothing to scoof at, but because they do not work enough (even they're willing to, I doubt there'll be enough jobs for aborigines, let alone refugees) to cover for social and assosiated costs for the countries that're accepting them, the result is raisining social burden, which is over the top for great deal of European countries as it is, social, ethnic, whatever tensions; 3) in turn that'll provoke instability within the European countries, left and right critics alike (up to very radical ones) will certainly take their chances to undermine current political stability, alines will certainly fuel this in one way or another (as participants or as bugaboos, or both); 4) other regions, like Central Asia, due to accumulated economic imbalances similar on smaller scale to the ones in EU and possible actions of interesants within and outside the region (involvement of very high-ranking officials in the recent escapade of Islamic Renaissance in Tajikistan should be among early red flags) will certainly join the instability parade with more or less the same consequences; 5) there's no leading force that could single-handedly solve exisiting problems, US included, which is counter-productive anyway, other forces mutual relationships are too complicated to work for stability; 6) EU's future is vague, in the long term errecting of rather odious nation-centric regimes in Europe as problem solver is a possiblity.

All in all, welcome to the brave new world :D

You haven't read what I wrote about the play. It was not cancelled, it was held as scheduled. The only difference is that it was not funded by lical government.

The play had nothing to do with Islam, it was about love, sex and relationships. The only reason it was not funded was the playwright who is a declared racist. Nobody rioted, there were no protests, it was a civilized discussion in which our Governor refused funding. 

Also, please understand that I wrote my first post to say that we as a country have nothing against Muslims because we have a portion of them as our countrymen, and they are completely integrated in all aspects of society, from holding high ranking governmental offices, being heads of institutions as well as our neighbors, friends and family. 

I wanted to show that it is posiible for Muslims to live according to the laws of the land they are in, and that refugees would be welcome to join them. Two of our national football team players are Syrians, their family integrated into our society, why refuse the others to do the same.

Therefore my initial post was not trying to comment on Australia and the problems you might have there. Ir is irrelevant to Croatia and my stance on refugees coming over here.

Is a restoration of the Caliphate the only possible way to re-stablize the middle east at this point? And I mean a Caliphate that actually follows the religion it claims to be a part of.

This type of thing is what the USA has been dealing with for years. Sucks to see it happen anywhere though. People should be able to feel safe and welcomed in their country of origin, and not have to flee elsewhere, for whatever reason.

Re-stabilize? Maybe. As a permanent solution? Hell, no.

Has there ever been a truely stable and free theocracy?

Wow, some refugees are being idiots. I guess they're all idiots then, and the ones that show gratitude are nothing but lying scumbags.

Keep your generalisations to yourself, good sir.

Permanent or not, the middle east need stability first. lol. Also, I suppose previous Caliphates were what you described? idk.

It's not just economic reason that drives people to choose Germany and UK over Eastearn Europe or Russia. I've never been to any Eastern European country, so I may be wrong. However I have Lithuanian, Latvian and Polish friends who told me that their countries are extremely racist and xenophobic. A counsin of my Lithuanian friend had moved to England a few years ago, after a few months here he returned to his country, because he couldn't stand black people. I know it's just one example, and I'm not saying that they're all racist and bad peolpe. But I think those wouldn't be good places to settle any refugees.